He was born in Derby. He started his academic career in philosophy and psychology. In 1972 he was awarded a PhD by the University of Edinburgh for his thesis "Speech and the regulation of behaviour."[2] In the 1970s he and Barry Barnes were the major figures of the strong programme, which put forward queries against philosophical a priorism in the understanding of scientific knowledge. This is an approach, popular in the philosophy of science, that simply precluded inquiries about science by treating successful scientific knowledge as simply true or rational without empirically investigating how such knowledge has come to be accepted as true or rational. Bloor's book Knowledge and Social Imagery (Routledge, 1976) is one of the key texts of the strong programme.
Bloor wrote extensively on the Kuhn/Popper debate, and is a representative figure of the sociology of scientific knowledge. In the 1980s when French scholars like Bruno Latour developed the actor-network theory (partially based on the strong programme), David Bloor strongly disagreed with the ANT camp when they argued that human and non-humans should be treated in an equivalent manner, going so far as to write an article entitled "Anti-Latour".[3]
Bloor, David (1983). Wittgenstein: a social theory of knowledge. Macmillan and Columbia.
Bloor, David (1991) [1976]. Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Bloor, David; Barnes, Barry; Henry, John (1996). Scientific knowledge: a sociological analysis. Athlone and Chicago University Press.
Bloor, David (1997). Wittgenstein: rules and institutions. Routledge.
Bloor, David (2011). The enigma of the aerofoil: rival theories in aerodynamics, 1909–1930. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Selected articles
Bloor, David (1970). "Is the Official Theory of Mind Absurd?". British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 21 (2): 167–183. doi:10.1093/bjps/21.2.167.
Bloor, David (1970). "Explanation and Analysis in Strawson's 'Persons'". Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 48 (1): 2–9. doi:10.1080/00048407012341411.
Bloor, David (1982). "Durkheim and Mauss revisited: classification and the sociology of knowledge". Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. 13 (4): 267–297. Bibcode:1982SHPSA..13..267B. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(82)90012-7.
Bloor, David (2000). "Critical Notice on The Social Construction of What?". Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 30 (4): 597–608. doi:10.1080/00455091.2000.10717545.
Bloor, David (2004), "Sociology of scientific knowledge", in Niiniluoto, Ilkka; Woleński, Jan; Sintonen, Matti (eds.), Handbook of epistemology, Dordrecht Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 919–962, ISBN9781402019852
Bloor, David (2007). "Epistemic Grace. Antirelativism as Theology in Disguise". Common Knowledge. 13 (2–3): 250–280. doi:10.1215/0961754x-2007-007.
Bloor, David (2007). "Ideals and Monisms: Recent Criticisms of the Strong Programme in the Sociology of Knowledge". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 38 (1): 210–234. Bibcode:2007SHPSA..38..210B. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.003.
Bloor, David (2008), "Relativism at 30,000 feet", in Mazzotti, Massimo (ed.), Knowledge as Social Order: Rethinking the Sociology of Barry Barnes, Ashgate Publishing
Bloor, David (2011), "Relativism and the sociology of knowledge", in Hales, Steven D. (ed.), A companion to relativism, Chichester, West Sussex, UK Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 433–455, ISBN9781405190213
^C., Bloor, David (1972). "Speech and the regulation of behaviour". hdl:1842/22721. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)