User talk:D.18th/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:D.18th. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University Athletic Association of the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — 🎄🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎄 (🔔 • 📝) 16:03, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Your edit to Kim Soo-hyun has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 (🔔 • 📝) 15:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Red Balloon (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 (🔔 • 📝) 16:30, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Please don't add live scores, just like you did here. See WP:LIVESCORES. Thanks. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 17:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

That's why I put {{mip}} template but later reverted it. But yeah I understand. 98Tigerius (talk) 04:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP: TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boys Planet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 11:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, 98Tigerius! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 11:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Single's Inferno S1 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kim Soo-hyun, 2023.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi 98Tigerius, and thanks for seeking out a third opinion. I removed/declined your request, as there has not been thorough talk page discussion. If you try to discuss the matter and local discussion can't result in consensus, please feel free to post at WP:3O again. Please make sure your future requests are dated but not signed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 05:33, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

WP:NOPIPE should not apply here as the artist is Seventeen BSS not Seventeen and I want to link to the relevant section. Lightoil (talk) 12:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

@JalenFolf I am not aware that I was logged out while editing. Thanks for the notice. 98Tigerius (talk) 05:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnimeLover129. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

The practice has been to wait till the program air then update episode count not wait for it to end. Lightoil (talk) 12:36, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Would you mind to give the link about that discussion? — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️•(🆃🅰🅻🅺) 12:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

On music bank there is this invisible comment open source editor to see Lightoil (talk) 13:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Noted and thanks. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️•(🆃🅰🅻🅺) 13:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

An article you recently created, UAAP Season 85 volleyball tournaments, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Physical, 100 poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello 98Tigerius. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:List of Boys Planet contestants, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Only mainspace articles are eligible for A10. Thank you. BangJan1999 19:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Boys Planet (TV show), which you proposed for deletion. Just history merge instead. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Lightoil (talk) 04:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from List of Boys Planet contestants, which you proposed for deletion. Just history merge instead. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Lightoil (talk) 04:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Boys Planet (TV show) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boys Planet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, 98Tigerius! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, 98Tigerius. Thank you for your work on UAAP Season 85 volleyball tournaments. User:Moops, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

TY, looks good to me.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moops}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding this edit, please do not change website/work to publisher=. Periodicals (websites with regularly updated content, as all three citations you changed on Rover (EP) are) should be in either website= or work= in Template:Cite web. See Help:Citation Style 1. Thanks. Ss112 13:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Noted on that. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ • (🆃🅰🅻🅺) 15:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

@98Tigerius Please review carefully before you accept any revision. You made an error here where that disruptive IP with misleading edit summary of "Added information" clearly did the contrary by removing content from the lead and also moving Chuu from past_members back to current_members which certainly is unconstructive. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the revision has been reverted. Thanks! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Noted and I'll be more careful next time. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ • (🆃🅰🅻🅺) 06:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi 98Tigerius, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I notice there is a draft pertaining the same contents of this article, I don't know if u r aware of this draft but I will send it to you for no reason KQ Fellaz 2 Brandon Targaryen (talk) 18:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know and I am not aware about this draft. 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ 02:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:ZB1 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:05, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Just a friendly heads-up in case you weren't already aware, since it's installed on your common.js: Careless use of ReferenceExpander has caused serious problems. It's currently at MFD, and a large cleanup project is underway to repair the citations damaged by the script. I and several other users have !voted that the script be deleted or disabled, and I wouldn't recommend using it at all unless you thoroughly check every reference it modifies against the previous revision. If you're interested in a more detailed explanation of the script's issues, Folly Mox has provided an excellent summary at the MFD. — SamX [talk · contribs] 05:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Lightoil (talk) 06:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your edits. I just wanted to let you know that I undid your revisions on Youth in the Shade and Zerobaseone, where you incorrectly added wikilinks to In Bloom, a song by Nirvana. Please take more care in the future to check the articles you are linking to. All the best! ⇒ Lucie Person (talk|contribs) 20:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dr. Romantic poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Day (TV series), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:31, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

How is this unnecessary? The Boyz should be sorted under "Boyz", not "The". Please see List of Music Bank Chart winners (2021) which is a Featured List. Also the article The Boyz (South Korean band) sorts under Boyz. (See the {{DEFAULTSORT:Boyz}} at the bottom of the page). -- EN-Jungwon 15:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Duty After School Part 2 poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Duty After School horizontal poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Thanks for uploading File:Dr. Romantic 2 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your contribution in the 2023 Asian Men's Volleyball Challenge Cup. I have noticed in the past you have reverted my edits on the "see also" section of the page, citing "unnecessary". However, whether this is unnecessarily or not is not solely based on your opinion, and in fact, is based on collective agreement between the editors as per MOS:SEEALSO. The example specific cited in the MOS such as "For example, the article on Jesus might include a link to List of people claimed to be Jesus because it is related to the subject but not otherwise linked in the article" clearly is the same logic as why I am adding the article in the see also section. I will ask you to please revert your edit, unless you have some compelling reasons for such reversion. - Kazuha1029 (talk) 02:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I would further explain that my edit is fully compliant with the style guide, specifically:

• A "See also" section is a useful way to organize internal links to related or comparable articles and build the web -> which is my intention
• Links in this section should be relevant and limited to a reasonable number. -> There are only 3 entries in the see also section, this is a reasonable amount.
• The "See also" section should not include red links, links to disambiguation pages (unless used in a disambiguation page for further disambiguation), or external links (including links to pages within Wikimedia sister projects). As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body. -> all of these requirements were met as the link I added was not a red link, disambuguation page, external link, and not repeated in the same article.

Upon all these reasons, I have gone ahead to revert your edit. Again, I appreciate your contribution to Wikipedia, but going forward please do not revert without proper reasoning, thank you.Kazuha1029 (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Jang Ki-yong Saluting in Military uniform.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 07:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, ref. to your edit, there is still a matter of "red link" in the "See also" section, hope that somebody will create that article soon. – Rick (talk) 01:56, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:2023 AVC Men's Championship MVP poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I have received a message from you that my contributions to the 2023 FIVB Volleyball Women's Olympic Qualification Tournaments page were not constructive. I would like detailed information about which of my contributions are against the rules. Because I don't think I have processed any wrong information. I am someone who follows the tournament very closely and I am trying to add the results to the wikipedia page with all their accuracy. Could you please explain what kind of illegal action I committed? 213.14.159.85 (talk) 08:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Adding live scores is a violation per WP:LIVESCORES, you and other users keeps adding it and I keep reverted and also warned them. Anyways, tournaments are done, keep that in mind and let's move on. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 12:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page A Good Day to Be a Dog, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:2023 AVC Men's Championship MVP poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi 98Tigerius, your editing has bought up few concerns. Firstly, you can't make up your mind like the inclusion of "time slot" and removing it later for no reason when I added to match on other articles for consistency reason. Secondly, you incorrectly replaced last= and first= with author= in which the latter is actually last= in the template coding which would display as last= in the References editor hence literally introduced incorrect syntax into the article by merging both the last name and first name into last name. Thirdly, you incorrectly removed the viewership section with an invalid rationale of WP:FUTURE which doesn't applies here nor even relevant usage, the status quo is to include the viewership section on the day of premiere not anything before that. Fourthly, you added "present" to {{End date}} when the template's documentation stated numbers only. Fifthly, you updated the article when the series has yet to even physically premiere while minor details, this should be avoided. Lastly, sorry to say this but kindly don't update article when you're not wellverse and/or ensure with the status quo and/or correct formatting and/or correct parameter's usage. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

@98Tigerius Fyi, WP:Communication is required hence don't blank it as you have not addressed nor acknowledge the concerns raised yet in particularly on point 2 which to me, you chosen to WP:ICANTHEARYOU as I can still see that you are deliberately introducing factual errors despite in good faith telling you above, which is clearly a disruptive signs. In addition to the above, you also made changes that simply doesn't make any sense to me nor was it an improvement such as this by changing a table's width that has no issues for you to even touch it in the first place, do you even bothered checking your edits? Lastly, I do not think issuing you a warning for personal attacks against other editors is "factual errors" when this diff clearly evidenced such. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

@98Tigerius As I have stated earlier, your changes to the table's width doesn't make any sense, neither do you bothered checking your edit. There is simply no issues with any of the current width, by changing it, you caused the date column to wrap instead when it isn't currently. In addition, the sizing is a standard sizing used across multiple articles hence I don't see any valid reasons for changing it. If you still refused to response nor aheld to the concerns made, I will have to report you to WP:ANI to force you to address the concerns instead since you're clearly ignoring me and the concerns listed nor willing to WP:COMMUNICATE despite it being requirement. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 18:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

@Paper9oll alright noted but about the table size other user put 550px as the width (see My Demon's Viewership section and other 2023 Korean drama articles' Ratings/Viewership section). ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 03:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

@98Tigerius Thanks you for the acknowledgement, I hopefully don't see such concerns being repeated. The table sizing are also formatted incorrectly in the linked articles, I have since fixed them. In which, of the 105 articles (latter link), only 10 are incorrectly formatted causing the date column to be wrapped. For general rule of thumb, use overall width of 600px if has TNmS (example), overall width of 550px if no TNmS (Nielsen Korea with Nationwide and Seoul column) (example), and overall width of 450px if only Nielsen Korea (Nationwide without Seoul column) (example), respectively. The child column (in order of Nationwide, Seoul, Nationwide) can be formatted either to 7em or 8em, not applicable if overall table's width is 450px (mentioned in preceding sentence) as this would caused wrapping. All listed width's value are tested and verified to be working (meaning not causing any form of column wrapping) on desktop of screen sizing of 12.8 inch and above. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

@Paper9oll thanks for the instructions you provided, it will be useful to me in the future. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 14:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Longlisted and shortlisted nominees are no different from all other nominations. Keep them the same (red) color so readers will not be confused on why long/short is different from regular nominations, when really it isn't. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 17:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Exo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I see you’re a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Television and I’m reaching out for help on a page I’m trying to improve: Talk:Ovation (American TV channel)#Updating this page. Would you be willing to weigh in on the suggestions I’ve made? I’d really appreciate the assistance. Thanks so much! Brennon16 (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

@Brennon16 do it yourself and be bold, mostly the changes you want are backup with reliable sources so there'll be no problem with that. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 03:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi @98Tigerius, not sure, if adding reception (as lede and/or as section) is a new area that you're exploring. Few things to note, don't add WP:PEACOCK (i.e. "was a commercial hit"), and don't add WP:OR content supported by WP:CIRCULAR (i.e. "Korean drama#List of xyz") when such materials isn't supported by secondary reliable sources. It's okay for Korean drama#List of xyz to WP:CALC as its sourcing directly supported each individual rows however it's not okay to use such CALC as CIRCULAR on other articles given that it's not supported by secondary reliable sources in which you're also not going to include the bunch of references used by each CALC entries to ensure content meets WP:VERIFY guidelines as it's simply impractical to do so and would also resulted in WP:REFBOMB. As per WP:ENGAGE, kindly acknowledge this message. Thanks! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

I just copyedit the paragraph I added from a related article. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 15:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

@98Tigerius Thanks for the clarification, I have copyedited the article to similarly removed PEACOCK. In addition, to updating the content to reflect whatever is stated by the source, in which, this is an good example on what I mean "supported by secondary reliable sources", as the Korea Herald source stated exactly that the series (at that point of time) is the "highest viewership rating among JTBC dramas" hence for this instance, it's okay to include such materials. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you also for giving lots of information. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 16:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

@98Tigerius No prob, thanks you! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I am editing the 8th Asia Artist Awards page as it happens. I am adding source, but my inputs have been reverted already. Heymikky (talk) 08:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi 98Tigerius! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 08:50, Saturday, December 23, 2023 (UTC)

Why are you moving pages which uses group disambiguation to band disambiguation against convention at WP:GROUPDAB? Please revert your moves or I will do it for you. Lightoil (talk) 02:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

@Lightoil reverted all except for TFN as their previous disambiguator was (boy band). 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 04:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello @98Tigerius, I see that you are getting ready to nominate List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023) for Featured List status. I was wondering if you are willing to co-nominate it with me as I have helped promote 8 Music Bank related lists to featured status over the last two years. -- EN-Jungwon 15:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

@EN-Jungwon of course I am, it's my pleasure. I've read your last FLC nominations for 2022 list and you wrote that it was/will be the last nominations you gonna do but now I'm glad that you will still continue it. Happy to help you in anyway! 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 15:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Ah, I was implying that I will be working on other music show articles until the end of the year. I had planned on nominating it after the end of the year since the list would then be complete. These days I'm working on getting Inkigayo lists to featured status. The 2015 list has already passed and the 2016 is under review. 2017, 2018, and 2019 are ready to be nominated and I'm working on the 2020 list in my sandbox. If you want you can help out with those lists too. I'll also be working on Show! Music Core lists. I'll take a look at the Music Bank 2023 list and do some copyediting. I also saw that you had opened a peer review for the list. I don't believe it's necessary but I don't mind keeping it open to see if anyone comments there. If you don't mind I want to nominate the list when the 2016 Inkigayo list gets one more support. -- EN-Jungwon 13:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

I see then that's great. Of course you may and I will try to help to improve the list. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 13:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)