User talk:Egeymi/Archive 6

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for your behind-the-scenes edits to Juan Carlos I of Spain, although some might miss them – they are appreciated. Donna Spencertalk-to-me⛅ 17:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You made my day, many thanks Donna for your kindness. Egeymi (talk) 17:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 August 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cesare Romiti, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 15:04, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Spencer, Egeymi (talk) 07:15, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic writing style
Capitalized "AI" signifies "family of," e.g., Al Saud, Al Fahd, Al Shaykh; when not capitalized and hyphenated to the succeeding word, denotes the definitive article, e.g., al-Hijaz, al-Hasa.^[1]

	The Original Barnstar
	I just wanted to make it perfect, so i added different era. Armin123421 (talk) 08:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jean Obeid, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, --Egeymi (talk) 05:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Captain and thank you very much Wikipedia for giving me such a wonderful place which teaches me valuable information everyday. Best, --Egeymi (talk) 20:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:47, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Captain --Egeymi (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Egeymi, when one makes a list, separating the items in the list with breaks, then it makes a difference if one writes (in code) item 1<br />item 2 or item 1 <br/> item 2. First, it is good practice to close a so called 'void element' with a space before the slash. It doesn't do any harm, and some older browsers still need the extra space in order to render the break correctly. Adding spaces before or after an item makes the item wider than necessary, and can cause an automatic line break where it is undesired. That's why I cleaned the list here (after having done this once or twice before already). I don't see any reason why one would want to replace the tidy version of that list with an untidy version like yours there, so I hope you'll accept my edit this time, now you have my explanation. 77.164.133.132 (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried to delete the unnecessary spaces. Mine did not produce untidy version. The list would be unnecessarily long and hard to insert new entity as it is. But it is not a big deal. Thanks for your detailed explanation although I cannot understand why it is problem when these extra spaces are deleted. --Egeymi (talk) 07:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for actually providing an edit summary after redoing your edit. Changing "The fall of..." to just "Reign" seemed a lot like someone trying to disruptively edit. However, your next edit after I reverted made a lot more sense, especially with the edit summary. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I always try to put edit summary but sometimes I forget. But don't worry my edits are not disruptive ones. --Egeymi (talk) 13:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. I was about to warn you when I saw that your talk page was filled with mostly good things. So I decided to just leave it and wait to see if you would revert my edit with an explanation. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 15:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 194.103.189.16 (talk) 12:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1882 establishments in Estonia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I noticed you undid some edits I made for the page of Waleed bin Ibrahim Al Ibrahim. The edits I made were updates (new awards and I included sources) and corrections (for example, the spelling of his name, and the acthe tual name of his media company). Could you please explain why these were cancelled out? Thank you. Mahmouddigitalink (talk) 12:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I reviewed your edits and mine. First I reinserted one of the sources you put which I reverted. If you want you can reinsert the other one. The reason for my revert was that you used hyphen in the name of the person, as you should have seen there is no hyphen in the title. Another point is that you added some unnecessary sections. Hope I can explain my reverts, happy editing, --Egeymi (talk) 15:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Der Bazar at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting on a response at Template:Did you know nominations/Der Bazar. Thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have just understood your request, sorry for the late response. Should I give the quotations here or in the related DKY page, thank you, --Egeymi (talk) 11:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the DYK nominations page, thanks. Gatoclass (talk) 11:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again. The intro to the article says "It was redesigned as Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung (meaning Illustrated Women's Magazine in English) from 1 January 1857." Does that mean that the magazine Der Bazar was renamed Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung? Or does "Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung" refer to the magazine's subtitle? Thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it should have been "its subtitle was changed to Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung". Thank you for the message, I haven't recognized it, so I will correct it, --Egeymi (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Egeymi, but I can't complete the review until you have supplied a QPQ. Gatoclass (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is my QPQ, I am not familiar new rules and I cannot find the related information. Based on your response I will try to do what is needed, thanks, --Egeymi (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a QPQ, it's a list of DYK credits you've been given. Since you have more than five DYK credits, you must provide a QPQ for each new DYK nomination you make. That means that you must review somebody's else's DYK nomination before your own can be approved. Instructions on how to review can be found at WP:DYKR. Thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you Egeymi (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can also use the reviewers' template to help you do a review - it basically contains a checklist of all the things you have to check. There is a link to the reviewers' template in the DYKToolbox of every DYK nomination, so you should have no trouble finding it. Cheers, Gatoclass (talk) 16:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

QPQ has been completed and details were added to the page, thanks again, Egeymi (talk) 18:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Der Bazar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that German fashion magazine Der Bazar had many spin offs, including Harper's Bazaar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Der Bazar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Der Bazar), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi Arabia magazines

Thank you for quality articles such as Faisal bin Abdullah Al Saud (born 1950), Nayef bin Abdulaziz, Der Weg (magazine), Annabelle (magazine), Der Bazar, 1,324 as of today, for copy-editing, for "try to fill the gaps since I consider it significant", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2670 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gerda Arendt, thank you very much for this precious prize which means a lot to me. Because whenever I saw it on the pages of other editors, I thought that maybe one day I would get it too. You made my day. Best, --Egeymi (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, and seeing what you gave us I'm a bit ashamed that it took me so long to notice, just because I meet so many on the Main page that I don't look behind the scenes. Nice to meet you. The article is also featured on Portal:Germany, DYK? - I have Aga Mikolaj on the Main page, ITN. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gerda Arendt as Rumi stated everything waits for its time. So today is the time for it. So happy for Der Bazar to be featured on Portal:Germany, DYK? I have looked at Aga Mikolaj, a short but successful life of a woman. Just amazing, --Egeymi (talk) 17:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thanks for turning Derviş Vahdeti and Volkan (newspaper) into blue links - as well as the hundreds of other articles you've put together previously. It's much appreciated! Jr8825 • Talk 13:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jr8825 thank you very much. You're very kind, best, Egeymi (talk) 19:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Season's greetings and Merry Christmas to you and your family. Have a wonderful holiday season. Cheers! RV (talk) 03:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas, Cheers! --Egeymi (talk) 04:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Great-granddaughters of Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Granddaughters of Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Egeymi, I noticed that you reverted an edit (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1076691070) .

This should be a mistake since I wrote it more aligned with the sources than the previous version.

What I edited: "He elaborated his grandfather's book, Kitab at Tawhid, interpreting them in the context of Ottoman invasion of Arabian Peninsula. Sulayman's works served as a manual for later Wahhabi scholars to make sense of the major tenets of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab. Based on Sulayman's approach, Classical Wahhabi scholars would formulate a novel doctrine of Takfir that expanded beyond the traditional paradigm of early Wahhabis and excommunicated most of the political opponents of the Second Saudi state"

Source: QUOTE

"Inspired by ‘Abdullah’s position against the Shi’ite sects, his son Sulayman Ibn ‘Abdullah (1785–1818) devoted his efforts to the work of interpreting the book of al-Tawhid written by his grandfather Muhammad Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab.... Sulayman was the first Wahhabi scholar to elab- orate further his grandfather’s notion of kufr and iman on which his successors in Al al-Shaykh later on based their ideas of excommunicating not only the Shi‘ite sects, but also non-Wahhabi Sunnis... Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab and his son ‘Abdullah considered the tenets of the Shi‘ites and Zaydis as deviation from Islam. However, they abstained from labelling them kuffar, even though they hinted that such deviation leads to kufr... Unlike in the time of Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab, Sulayman witnessed strong Ottoman interference as well as the Egyptian military campaign which led to the gradual dissolution in 1818 of the Wahhabi-Saudi state in Najd.. To defend the Wahhabi creed, Sulayman and other Wahhabi scholars, who had found shelter in some sedentary and nomadic localities, began to articulate a new version of takfir beyond that of the first generation. To a great extent, the new version of takfir involved Al al-Shaykh and other Wahhabi scholars in reinvigorating and giving new meaning to the traditional concept of takfir. They used takfir in order to reconsolidate the Second Saudi State established in 1824 and extended it to include even those scholars who had taken sides with the Egyptians and Ottomans "

END QUOTE

Rest of the pages in the ref elaborate how later Wahhabi scholars acted upon Sulayman's doctrines. So I think it was probably a mistake on your part

(shadowwarrior8.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message, but you are changing the name of the subject and reference type, distorting the author names etc. So all these will be reinserted. Egeymi (talk) 13:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thank you Egeymi. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 13:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Egeymi (talk) 13:57, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Egeymi, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Isro! (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, thank you very much --Egeymi (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Egeymi a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 16:45, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, --Egeymi (talk) 16:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trifon (disambiguation) is an excellent name page, but not such a good disambiguation page. Disambiguation pages should simply be a list of articles whose titles can be easily confused with (in this case) Trifon. References and details, such as name information, aren't included.

May I would suggest that the contents of Trifon (disambiguation) be moved to Trifon (given name)? The DAB page could include Trifon, Trifon (given name), Saint Trifon, Tryphon (disambiguation), and All pages with titles containing Trifon. I would be happy to help, if you dont feel like dealing with it. Leschnei (talk)

I put together a possible DAB page here - let me know what you think! Leschnei (talk) 13:51, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Leschnei I think you have better knowledge about these pages, so your proposal is fine with me. Thank you very much for your kind message, best, Egeymi (talk) 15:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, feel free to make any changes you think necessary. Leschnei (talk) 23:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Egeymi (talk) 04:29, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Defunct magazines published in the Soviet Union has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it not needed ? Every TV channel has it's name added to the infobox Check for example Al Jazeera, Al Arabiya etc.

Forest576 (talk) 21:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean title appears in the infobox whether or not it is written there. --Egeymi (talk) 02:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears as website link and live link only for me. I think every TV station infobox should be consistent in this regard.

Forest576 (talk) 08:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name is default so no need to write it. In addition, please do not disorder the infobox --Egeymi (talk) 08:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the infobox yes you're right in this infobox name is not default so it should be inserted. Sorry, --Egeymi (talk) 08:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching an understanding.

Forest576 (talk) 10:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you doing okay!!

The mark on Mish'aal is for the pronunciation of the name.George the writer (talk) 19:51, 17 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, yes I know but it is part of spoken variance not the written one. And the title is not like that. Best, --Egeymi (talk) 16:51, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re Matti Lehtinen I am not happy with the section you inserted, because his education ran to 1949, but his debut was in 1948. It also seems too short a section to need that separation, imho. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear that it made you unhappy, but birth and education cannot be part of Career. --Egeymi (talk) 06:57, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw that you were a member of WikiProject Saudi Arabia and wanted to let you know that there's currently an RFC going on on the talk page for the flag of Saudi Arabia on Commons which you might be interested in participating in. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks! HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 18:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me about it. --Egeymi (talk) 18:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Die Brennessel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Die Brennessel was a satirical magazine devised by the Nazi Party as a propaganda tool? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Die Brennessel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Die Brennessel), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 13,000 views (541.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As there is no primary topic for this name, the disambiguation page was properly at the base title, Gillian White. I'm not sure why you created a new duplicate disambiguation page at Gillian White (disambiguation), but I have turned it into a redirect to the existing disambiguation page. Am I missing something? Were you planning to make one of them into the Primary Topic or something? PamD 18:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you also created Horace White (disambiguation) recently: here, there is a different format to use for the dab page because there is a primary topic (I've fixed it), and also the hatnote on the Horace White article needs to be changed to point to the dab page (I've done so). There's no point having a dab page and also a hatnote pointing to two other Horaces: that way, if someone had found a further Horace, like Horace Alton White, they might have added him to the hatnote and not the dab page, or the other way round, and that way leads to muddle all round. I've added him to the dab page. All is now well, but please note how dab pages work. Thanks. PamD 20:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. It is very useful for me --Egeymi (talk) 09:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Egeymi please to Create article of First government of Jafar-Sharif Emami. Thank you PipitRKT1 (talk) 04:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]