User talk:Jfire

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: the Arab–Israeli conflict post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people the Balkans or Eastern Europe They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

I noticed you reverted my PROD at Princess Isabelle of Salm-Salm and suggested an AFD in the edit summary. As I am unable to start one myself as an unregistered user, I would appreciate help as to what options I have. 46.132.74.112 (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and made a nomination on your behalf: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Isabelle of Salm-Salm. Best, Jfire (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I might participate in it later if I have something to comment. 46.132.74.112 (talk) 06:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why those fake democracy protest don’t tell the truth that Thai protest democracy is Ultranationalist who against monarchy and anti refugee 2001:FB1:18E:2954:711A:ED4B:2BF9:B1EE (talk) 13:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not biased but here is fun fact. Thai protest for democracy never claim Palestine genocide or support but Uyghurs they claim exist about genocide. Here is USAID aim terrorized Thailand about Anti Myanmar refugees ignored Palestine genocide 2001:FB1:18E:2954:19E:1CAA:DCF0:663B (talk) 12:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know what you're referring to. If you wish to discuss changes to a particular article, please use that article's talk page. Jfire (talk) 16:45, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's harassment. Bearian (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for proposing for deletion this gaslighting spam. My Nana was on the grapefruit diet in the 1970s that he claims to have invented in 2001. Bearian (talk) 01:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Jfire. Let's talk about my edits to Ross Ulbricht. Why exactly were my last ones not neutral? I stated that he was a libertarian activist, which is totally true, as well as the fact that his arrest and conviction were controversial. 76.78.159.8 (talk) 21:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my wikipedia account I just created by the way. One more thing I want to say, I think it's a bit unfair to list him as a convicted criminal first in his wikipedia article. Although a presidential pardon doesn't expunge a criminal conviction and he is still technically a convicted criminal, I feel he ought to have some discretion made as all of the consequences of his crimes have now been removed. If he doesn't have to put his felony conviction on hiring paperwork, I don't see why he should have to have it as the first thing on his wikipedia article. Libercrat (talk) 21:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit describing him as a "hero" and his arrest as "unjust" is not neutral. It was correctly reverted, and then you reinstated it. Jfire (talk) 21:36, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the description of Ulbricht as a "convicted criminal" in the article lead, I suggest you start a discussion on the article talk page about it. I think there's some merit to your argument, but you'll need to reach consensus with other editors. Note that the article is designated as a contentious topic and all contributors are expected to adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey kids,

this gentleman's notability rests solely on his arrest and conviction and incarceration and the subsequent events.

The lead should reflect this fact.

disinterested editor, Augmented Seventh (talk) 00:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Perhaps you would like to chime in on the talk page so that a clear consensus can be established? Jfire (talk) 00:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]