User talk:Jumplike23

Please feel free to leave a comment. Thank you.

Hello! I've looked at the article you wrote, Jim Benkert, and I noticed that the wording in one section is almost identical to the wording in the source. It's critically important that you don't add anything to an article that might be copyright text. Make sure to write articles yourself, only using the source to verify the facts. I encourage you to rewrite that section in your own words, but at the very least make sure you don't add any more text like this. Copyright issues are taken seriously on Wikipedia. With that said, thank you for your contributions overall! Every bit helps! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I just fixed. My apologies. I will do better. Jumplike23 (talk) 22:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jumplike, this is to just let you know the subheadings you created on Renmark High School have seemed to, according to the Rater Tool, decreased the article from B-class down to C-class. Personally, I think it makes the article significantly more readable, and I even tried to do the same thing on Albert State School to get it up to Good article status, but ultimately made it worse for some reason and ended up just reverting it. Anyway, this was just to provide you the courtesy on why the article was downgraded to C-class and on a side note to personally thank you for even accepting the draft in the first place (so many editors just decline school articles even though they have good references, I have seen it so many times). 2024 is Underway (talk) 09:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2024 is Underway Thank you! I don't worry so much about the automated rater tool. To the human eye, the subheadings significantly improve the accessibility and readability of the article. I would re-add the subheadings to Albert State School. I was happy to accept it. Let me know if you want me to look at some other drafts. Jumplike23 (talk) 20:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will re-add the subheadings for Albert State School now and if you wanted to look at Draft:East Perth Primary School that would be great! It has significant coverage and has 3 refs from ABC news. I think it is significant and could be a very good article when the school opens in 2029. The only problem I have with it is that I have a feeling that East Perth Primary School is not it's real name, but I could be wrong. Thanks. 2024 is Underway (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I managed to get Renmark High School back up to B-Class and that East Perth Primary School ended up getting published (when I told you about it, I didn't see that it was declined, sorry about that, but the issues ended up being resolved). Thanks Again. 2024 is Underway (talk) 08:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're likely new editing Wikipedia and haven't engaged. But the trouble is with the Alcoholics Anonymous page is there things you seem to be unaware of. For instance, you have completely eliminated the Cochrane review and apparently don’t understand the difference between a review and studies and how significance it finding. When you do a barrage of edits many of them containing errors you have done too much. Please slow down so we can catch up enough is enough at this point.

Hi User:5ive9teen, I hope this message finds you well. I am not new to editing on Wikipedia. Your message here strikes me as unprofessional. I will not engage in the personal back and forth. To respond on the merits of your comment, I have not completely eliminated mention of the Cochrane review. There is an entire paragraph on the study and additional mention of it in the article as it stands. Your comment on the review vs. study is well-taken and I have changed the subheading. Jumplike23 (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Peace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Peace until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 04:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any external relationship or connection with Boston College that can trigger a conflict of interest? GuardianH (talk) 01:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I do not have a conflict of interest. I do not feel that my edits triggered boosterism. The article was in poor shape and I worked to improve it. In fact, I feel that I went through and removed undue language and boosterism that was in the athletic section. I merely tried to summarize the article in the lede. Jumplike23 (talk) 01:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just focusing on adding the soccer player Tylee Craft file.181.197.42.215 (talk) 04:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi the article is about a football player who died of cancer recently. Your edits to this point have not been about the subject unless you are in the process of continuing to revise. Please let me know. Jumplike23 (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tylee Craft, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jumplike23. Thank you for your work on Mother Seton Academy. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jumplike23. Thank you for your work on 2008 disappearance of CIA operatives in the South China Sea. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jumplike23. Thank you for your work on Disappearance of Lina Khil. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Disappearance of Abby Patterson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Not ready for mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. HeMahon (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jumplike23. Thank you for your work on Nathaniel Delemarre. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution! May you have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Jumplike23, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created several short biographies of women and now look forward to many more. In this connection, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. If you would like others to see your interest in the project, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 Online events: New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024 Announcements from other communities Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025 Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 Tip of the month: Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 13:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]