User talk:LilHelpa
RequestPlease check the page of Lakhahi Raj as earlier
Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Proud to be here! Thanks! --LilHelpa (talk) 12:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Summer greetings
... with thanks for what you fix! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 28An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Product management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scrum. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Antoine LoyselThanks for starting the Antoine Loysel page and listing it at WP:PNT. To be honest, it doesn't seem like your French is quite up to the task of translating from French articles; this sounds pretty much like a machine-translation. The consensus at Wikipedia, is that a machine translated page is not helpful; for one thing, anyone can translate the page online, and get the latest version. I appreciate your taking the time to find a page that French Wikipedia has, and we don't, and wanting it to appear here. My recommendation in a case like this, would be to translate just the WP:LEADSENTENCE, and include at least one good reference. You included three; that's even better, and probably makes it deletion-proof, even if it's only one sentence. You can also bring over the "Bibliography" or "Works" section, as that doesn't have to be translated. If there's a "See also", you can bring that over, too, if the links correspond to articles that exist at en-wiki. Finally, add an {{Expand French}} template to the top, and the proper WP:STUB to the bottom (see WP:STUBLIST). It's helpful if you link it to the original French article, by clicking the 'Edit links' link in the left sidebar by the language links. There are some editors who are good at translating content, but don't like finding a foreign article that needs translation and starting off the structure of a new English article. If you like doing that, that's really valuable and helpful, and if you can crank them out, that would be great. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Copy and translate attributionPlease don't forget to include a proper copy or translation attribution statement to the edit summary whenever you copy or translate material from another article. I know you're familiar with the concept, beucase you already did it when you created Carola Giedion-Welcker in this edit. In the case of Antoine Loysel, I've added translation attribution for your 21:30, August 25 edit. Please remember to include it in the edit summary. If you forget, see WP:RIA. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:12, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Barnstar
thank youmy experience with WP is bad. Most entries I created get edited either by people who wage their own wars or by ignorant passers-by. Almost every time I inspect an entry I had written years ago, I find it damaged by what I think are careless edits. There are exceptions, though. Each time I stumble over your edits (and few other people, like John of Reading), I am overwhelmed by the amount of good will, lack of personal interest, dedication, systematic effort and - apparently - the intention to help the others. I keep wondering who you are and what drives you, and the only answer I can arrive at is that yes, there are angels on this planet. rgds, --Dd1495 (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
HyphensPlease be aware of Wikipedia's Manual of Style for hyphens, which says "Avoid using a hyphen after a standard -ly adverb (a newly available home, a wholly owned subsidiary) ...". In particular, in the article Eastern Coalfields. Happy editing! Chris the speller yack 18:41, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Holmes'sDo you consider this to be the preferable possessive spelling for Rupert Holmes, whose article uses American spelling and grammar? Thanks for any advice. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and thank you!!Thank you for your good work on Wikipedia, and for taking the time and effort to make it continually better- I really appreciate your judgement, help and good sense. Very best wishes for a merry Christmas and a productive New Year! SiefkinDR (talk) 13:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Onward to AlbiI really appreciate your careful editing of Metz Cathedral. I just wanted to let you know that, with Metz about finished, I'll soon be moving on to Albi Cathedral, a most remarkable place, and would very much welcome your collaboration there. Best wishes for the New Year- stay safe and well! SiefkinDR (talk) 14:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for your efforts
Always preciousTen years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. You helped me in the beginning, and I love to see your name on my watchlist! Some impressions of places, flowers and music for you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Happy Fourteenth First Edit Day!
Happy New Year, LilHelpa!LilHelpa,
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages. — Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Happy First Edit Day!
Thanks! LilHelpa (talk) 13:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |