User talk:Mike hangzhou

Line 17 (Shenzhen Metro), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 02:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ma Zuguang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 06:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike hangzhou! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I do not see that this "problem" references to one source is a subject for a stand-alone article. Could it be incorporated into Real-time ridesharing or Peer-to-peer ridesharing?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Problem of utility-aware ridesharing on road networks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Problem of utility-aware ridesharing on road networks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam Sailor 10:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chen Guangxi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Mike hangzhou, thanks for creating Line S1 (Suzhou Rail Transit)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please indicate why this school needs its own article as opposed to being a section of HIT. Provide sources independent of the subject that focus on the school.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:School of Energy Science and Engineering, HIT and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:School of Energy Science and Engineering, HIT, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:08, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Policy banks (China) is very confused. Starts off talking about 2 banks, second paragraph we are up to 3, one of which is referred to by a different name from the first paragraph. Readers don't have a hope. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:37, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your advice, Tagishsimon! I've checked the two misleading problems and have corrected both of them. Please check, and thank you again.

It's looking much better; I have made some minor changes. China Development Bank still describes that bank as a policy bank, so we could do with more clarity about its status ... but as with all things, all articles could be improved. Depends how much time and interest any of us have. Thank you for starting Policy banks ... very welcome. --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind remark.I'm a finance student from China and I understand the concept 'policy bank' is very commonly heard in the news. But this is a term based on Chinese financial system, so this type of bank is unique from western banking system. China Development Bank was founded as policy bank but was no long officially defined as such a bank by the Chinese government in 2015 because of its transformation. I think the wikipedia page of this bank needs update and I will help deal with it when I'm free. Please check the official website if you're interested in this bank: [1], and please note that a 'development finance institution' mentioned in the first paragraph is not equal to a policy bank. Mike hangzhou (talk) 14:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zhejiang Tailong Commercial Bank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taizhou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kind reminder. It is truly a problem and I have corrected it. Mike hangzhou (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike hangzhou! You created a thread called expert article editor on economics at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I mentioned it in the comment to the edit, but I used nowiki tags to disable the template on your user page because it was adding two main space categories to your user page in violation of WP:USERNOCAT. I'm sorry if this disabled useful functionality for your page. Sauzer (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No worrys,Sauzer; it's really my pleasure to have you correcting it for me. It really should be me to apologize for not have known the rules previously. Thank you!Mike hangzhou (talk) 04:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike hangzhou,

I have a question. You created the article Roads of Tang Poetry. Thank you for this article! In it, you translated 全国唐诗之路与天姥山学术研讨会 as China National Symposium on Road of Tang Poetry and Tianmushan. Could this also be translated as China National Symposium on Road of Tang Poetry and Tianmu Mountain? If so, it would be nice to include the link to this moutain's article in Wikipedia. Or is Tianmushan another mountain, or no mountain at all?

(I have no special relation to Tang era poetry, I just found your article by a search for the misspelling peotry (poetry).)

--Cyfal (talk) 13:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wowkie Zhang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG + article has too much issue.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 11:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]