User talk:Patar knight/Archive 5
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. OopsMy apologies, I meant to leave a message for someone else. Sorry for the mix-up. Keilana|Parlez ici 23:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Terrell SassTerrell also in a MAJOR advetisement in Modern Drummer Magazine, and being features infuture clinics for Yamaha. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.211.153.59 (talk) 01:27, 8 June 2009 (UTC) the best one is atlantainstituteofmusic.com. they paid for the advertisement to be placed on the Modern Drummer website.. (to help promote the school) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.211.153.59 (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Outline update - Good news and bad news - 06/08/2009The big push continues. And it seems to be working! The good news is that there's growing support for outlines, and there are more editors than ever editing them! The bad news is that the complainers are disproportionately represented on the project's various talk pages. While many editors work diligently on the front end, a handful of complainers are trying to tear down the project behind the scenes. Fortunately, barely enough supporters have been watching those pages that no consensus for moving or merging the outlines has succeeded. So far... Big problem: ignorance of what outlines are for and their benefitsMost of the opposition seems to be unaware of the complete range of what outlines are used for. They just don't get it. This is why it is important to complete the outline article draft. An article with a comprehensive treatment of outlines would be the perfect place to refer anybody unfamiliar with outlines to. Opposers also don't seem to understand how outlines differ from some other page type that they prefer. Some think articles are good enough as an overview, others think portals are more in-depth, still others think categories or navigation boxes are the most efficient and useful way to organize and present topical information. Some have simply never seen an "Outline of" page before and think they are a new type of page (they've been around under other names since 2001). If you run across anyone who doesn't understand the role of outlines on Wikipedia, Wikipedia:Why do we have outlines in addition to...? might help reduce their misconceptions or uncertainties about outlines. On the bright side, you've got to see this...To add the outlines and related support pages to your watchlist (takes less than 30 seconds), cut and paste them from Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist into your raw watchlist. For a way to improve the display of your watchlist - by namespace (very useful) - see Watchlist sorter, or use the "super fast upgrade" at WP:OTS. Or go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist using Related changes (currently without the talk pages) and click on "Related changes" in the toolbox menu on the sidebar on the left side of your screen. The big pushThe big push started with about a thousand banners and notices being placed on article talk pages all over Wikipedia. But it didn't stop there... Welcome our new members...The following Wikipedians have joined the OOK team. Be sure to stop by their talk pages and introduce yourselves.
Enter the mentors!I asked a bunch of mentors at WP:ADOPT for advice. Several of them answered on my talk page. Most of those who replied were happy to help, and posted some very good ideas. A couple even joined the project. Here are their ideas, and what is being done about them. A few of the tasks still need volunteers:
Linking to outlines has begunTo the tops of about 30 subject articles, I placed a test batch of hatnotes leading to the corresponding outlines. The hatnotes look like this:
The rationale for the hatnotes is that each outline is a topical guide for its subject, and since tables of contents go at the front of a book, a link to each outline should be placed at the front of its subject. Unfortunately, not all editors agree. Some of the hatnotes have already disappeared. :( Some past discussions pertaining to the existence or location of outlinesNote that the "Lists of topics" are of two types, including outlines and indexes, so discussions to remove, move, or merge those are usually relevant to the OOK. Also, outlines are a type of list, so discussions that affect lists in general also pertain to outlines. We've got to be on our toes!
I've excluded links to live discussions, out of respect for WP:CANVASS. Table of contents to OOK-related stuffHere's a directory of outline support pages: Keep up the great work!The Transhumanist 04:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC) WPOOK advert banner under development, here's the beta...Thank you to those who suggested WPOOK have an animated advert banner. Penubag got working on it right away. Here's what he's come up with so far: Penubag needs feedback. I've posted a few changes for him to make to it. Please post additional comments and suggestions for him at User talk:Penubag#Chocolate banner. Thank you. The Transhumanist 02:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Helping with an ArticleHello, I'm JayLeno175. I created the page List of Wars Involving Canada. I thankyou for redirecting tha, because I did not realize that the Military History of Canada page already had a list of wars involving Canada. I also created the article List of Wars Involving Germany. I was wondering if you could either redirect or help me improve it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JayLeno175 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Outline collaboration!As you know, Penubag is working on a banner to advertise the Outline WikiProject. And he's almost done. The banner prominently presents the "Outline of chocolate", which of course will become the most widely advertised outline as soon as the banner goes live. The first thing many editors will do after seeing the banner is look for that outline. The problem is, we don't have one. So that's our first outline collaboration! I started a draft this morning. It needs to be finished and moved to the article namespace before we can start using Penubag's banner ad! Come join in on the fun. It's chocolate! The Transhumanist 22:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC) The real problem is that, currently, we do not have a user warning system for third-party removal of speedy deletion tags, and that's why I had to bring the article to AfD. You were quite right in saying that chances are very slim that the creator and the IP were not the same person, but per WP:AGF I had to assume that we were dealing with meatpuppetry, not sockpuppetry. The AfD nomination of this article was only meant to maintain awareness of a speedy deletion nomination while avoiding an edit war just to maintain the speedy deletion tagging. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 12:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC) okok —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khalidshou (talk • contribs) 01:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Ben devoreOk, thanks for the tip. I'll remember it for next time. ɪntəsvɛnsk 19:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC) Thanks!
Can You check me references?Can you please check my references? (On 50th Battalion, CEF) I'm not finished with the citations though, (Mrjeremister (talk) 00:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)) CitationsCan you help me with the citations? I don't know what to do! (Mrjeremister (talk) 21:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)) WPOOK's advert banner is done!Is it perfect? Can it be improved? Penubag loves feedback. Please let him know if it can be further improved. Thank you. The Transhumanist 23:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC) Double postFYI - double post here. No need to respond on my talk page. 7 talk | Δ | 02:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC) Outline update - Full Steam Ahead! - 06/18/2009Several members of the WikiProject have been hard at work. Buaidh has been building and refining the outlines on the U.S. States, the states' historical outlines, and the Historical outline of the United States. Lately, his edits have dominated the project's watchlist readout. (I think he's overdue for a barnstar or two. hint hint) Penubag has been working on medals for all the main branches of the OOK, and has completed the OOK WikiProject's animated advert banner (see below). Highfields has been filling in the currencies for each country on their respective outlines. NuclearWarfare and Thehelpfulone have been busy with WP:AWB, posting banners and notices, and helping our sister project, the Index WikiProject, get established. Indexes work hand-in-hand with the outlines and are prominently linked to from the top of most of them. And the outlines, which serve as tables of contents, are only as good as the pages they link to. Since we started integrating (linking) the OOK and its support pages into the encyclopedia and into the Wikipedia community, activity on outlines has been increasing. Though there's still much left to do. But I digress. There are a couple more... Stefan is building the Outline of sharks. MacMed has joined our advanced wiki-tools team, and is currently adding links to outlines in the corresponding subject articles' see also sections. Be sure to stop by their talk pages and say "hi". WPOOK's advert banner has gone live!Penubag has finished this WikiProject's animated advert banner, and it is now being displayed on the Wikipedia ads template which in turn is displayed on about 2000 user pages. Each time someone access one of those pages, there is a 1 in 184 chance of them viewing this:
If you'd like to display the banner on your userpage locked-on to the ad as above, use the following code: {{Wikipedia ads|ad=184}} (By the way, it's been awhile since we've barnstarred Penubag). Watchers needed!If you haven't already, please add the entire project's watchlist to your watchlist. Here's how:
Check the watchlist every time you log on!I forgot to mention this step above. :) The OOK is in 5 other Wikipedias?I can't make heads or tails of 'em, but these links were on Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge:
Resurrected from the grave yard...I discovered an AfD discussion on possibly the first article named "Outline of", which was called Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics, and which was created 4 years ago. Of course they deleted it. But now it has many friends, and so it has risen from the dead. :) See the DRV discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 7#Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics. A diamond buried in project space
RecruitingRecruiters needed. Drop me a note if you are interested. Advice from the mentors
More outline tasks
New outlines in article space
New outline draftsMain discussion pages
Keep up the great workI'm impressed with the level of enthusiasm and work going into the outlines. I'm proud to be working with each of you. The Transhumanist 23:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Grant murphyFair enough - I don't care much what tag it gets, so long as it's tagged. Ends, means, yadda yadda yadda... --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 02:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
NominationJust a note re your answer to question four, which you may want to clarify: The circumstances under which a no-consensus close defaults to delete are very narrow, perhaps narrower than you suggest; a consensus does not exist for defaulting to deletion but where the biographical subject is non-public and relatively unknown (as, for instance, in the case Wizardman presents, where an article is based on narrow, generally negative coverage, probably a 1E) and where the subject requests deletion (see Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion discussion). In general, then, if a discussion focuses on whether an article on whether an article complies with BLP and there is no consensus, we default to "keep". There continues to be, as you surely know, much debate over what our policy ought to be, but there is not yet support for the broader construction your answer seems to suggest you hold. Thought you might want to expand your answer, at least if anyone else objects to the lack of nuance; wouldn't want an otherwise acceptable nominee to suffer because of a minor inaccuracy. Cheers, 99.154.80.69 (talk) 05:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Your RFABest wishes for your RFA -- Tinu Cherian - 10:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC) Outline collaboration #2: Outline of GibraltarThis outline is approaching completion. I added a bunch more links, finding them with the following Google site-specific searches of Wikipedia: (You can use the wikicode for the links above as the basis for new searches - just replace "Gibraltar" with any other country or region name). Request: please redirect the redlinks! (bluelinking...)The redlinks need to be bluelinked where possible. The most useful way is to create redirects leading to the material (which is usually included in a section of an article - see Wikipedia:Redirect#Redirects to page sections. That way, when the redirect pages are replaced by the actual articles, the links will already point to the right places. Please take a crack at it, and bluelink a few. Thank you. Good luck. Have fun. The Transhumanist 01:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC) P.S.: on an unrelated matter, where should the Outline of chocolate be placed on the OOK? -TT
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC) That was fun. :) The Transhumanist 23:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Outline update - Push push push - 06/25/2009Work is proceeding apace...
The current consensus is that we can't place a hatnote leading to an outline at the top of a subject articles unless the outline being presented is of at least the same quality-level as the article.
Improve outline quality by completing them. Place hatnotes for the outlines of high enough quality. Guidelines pertaining to outlines need to be updated. Outlines emerged as a class of pages only a few months ago, and most of the relevant guidelines don't cover them specifically. For example, Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists is incredibly out of date. Invite wikignomes, wikielves, and wikifairies (all 2500+ of them) to help on the outlines . Identify 600 more subjects with coverage extensive enough to justify outlines, create rudimentary drafts for them, and post notices to the corresponding WikiProjects and subject talk pages to help build them. Convert outlines titled "List of" to outline articles, and add them to the OOK. There are a few hundred of these. Conversion instructions are needed. Add a description of outlines to About Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Basic navigation, and add tips about outlines to the WP:TOTD and Tips library.
The Transhumanist 20:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC) RfA concernRegarding your RfA, I have to following concern: at 2008 South Ossetia war it seems that you incorrectly judged the consensus, because you ignored the opinions given in the previous discussion [1]. This is something admins should not do. Was your comment a mistake? Offliner (talk) 02:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC) RfA successfulA consensus has been reached by your peers that you should be an admin. I have made it so. Please review Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list and keep up the great work. Sincerely, Kingturtle (talk) 03:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful request for adminship.Teeninvestor (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Request for feedbackMinnecologies has done an incredible amount of work on Outline of forestry and posted a note to me on my talk page requesting feedback. I've posted my observations at Talk:Outline of forestry#Finished outline review. Please take a look at the outline and let Minnecologies know what you think of it on the outline's talk page. Thank you. The Transhumanist 19:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 20:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC).
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
|