User talk:Renata3

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around. Meelar (talk) 16:40, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Archives

Jul. – Sep. 2005 Oct. – Dec. 2005 Dec. – Feb. 2006 Feb. – Apr. 2006 Apr. – May 2006 May – Sep. 2006 Sep. – Dec. 2006 Dec. – Apr. 2007 Apr. – Oct. 2007 Oct. – May 2008 May – Nov. 2008 Nov. – Oct. 2009 Oct. – Oct. 2010 Nov. 2010 – June 2014 June 2014 – Feb. 2020 All (very large)

Kad nebūtų beprasmių taisymų ir atitaisymų, norėčiau visgi sužinoti, kuo remiatės palikdama kai kuriuos neteisingus ar labai abejotinus teiginius apie pasipriešinimo bolševikams kovas Lietuvoje. Tai labai jautrūs klausimai ir matyti teiginius, kurie jau seniai paneigti Lietuvoje (ne tik Lietuvos istorikų, bet ir JAV) - nerimta. Netgi rimto istoriko Snyder knygoje apie Lietuvą yra grubių klaidų. Kol Lietuvą jo knygos pasiekė, „traukinys jau buvo nuvažiavęs“ - knyga išleista ir išversta į nemažai kalbų. Klaidų tiražavimas įvyko... O toliau vieni per kitus cituoja, netikrindami, kad tai jau paneigta... Lietuvos šmeižimo (čia jau net ne klaidos) kampaniją vykdo JAV ir Lietuvos pilietis (net nekalbantis lietuviškai) Grant Arthur Gochin. Lietuvoje šiuo metu jis pralaimėjo visus teismus, turi netgi atlyginti Lietuvos genocido ir rezistencijos tyrimo centrui bylinėjimosi išlaidas. O viso to esmė - Gochin spaudė Lietuvą, kad būtų remiamasi tik NKVD ir KGB archyvų medžiaga. Kiti šaltiniai akivaizdžiai parodė, kad tai sovietinės propagandos klastotės. Nejaugi Wikipedijos nuostata – kad Lietuvos istorja Wikipedijoje būtų pristatoma pagal sovietinių propagandistų sukurptas klišes?

It's an undeniable fact that LAF was anti-Semitic (many anti-Semitic texts authored by Škirpa available on the Internet), many of its members collaborated with the Nazis (the infamous TDA), and ended up participating in the Holocaust. Yes, Snyder is not the most reliable author, and it appears Škirpa was not in Lithuania at the time ans was not inciting mobs, but basic facts are correct that LAF was anti-Semitic and LAF members participated in the Holocaust. The controversy about the street names is real -- whether you or I think that one or the other side has no merit -- and got coverage in foreign press. This makes it perfectly reasonable information to be included in the article. It's not Wikipedia's role to pick the "winner" and erase contradictory information, but to present facts and describe the controversies as they occur. Renata (talk) 05:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Soviet Russia. Since you had some involvement with the Soviet Russia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Renata3 I guess you were able to verify it? The way it was written threw me off, that is why I undid that.Driverofknowledge (talk) 12:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Renata3. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 09:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

serial ^# 09:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, SN54129, but I am good for now. Renata (talk) 18:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Renata3, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Linguistic Barnstar
		For giving me a quick and easy solution on how to link to other-language Wiki articles a while ago. :) Ivario (talk) 11:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Renata. In early July, you moved this article to Draft space, with good cause. The editor has re-published it several times without addressing the POV issue that you identified. Just wondering if you could look into this please? Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 08:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to thank you for your vigilance on the Alaric I page. --Obenritter (talk) 16:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Renata3. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Missing book reference added.
Message added 09:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hello dear Renata, regarding your request, I am happy to notice you that my research was successful, adding the wanted book to the article Metallurgy during the Copper Age in Europe. Thanks also for the suggested script, it is really useful. Kind regards from Germany. Abani79 (talk) 09:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC) Abani79 (talk) 09:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thank you for your message; I have upgraded the citation copied from the French WP. I am expecting that this situation will arise very rarely so will get the script.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I've now added that missing link to the Nakamura River page. Fixer88 (talk) 03:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I think u are one of the senior administraitor on Page Chandelas of Jejakabhukti recently a editor edits the page and Add unnecsary details which i corrected and restored stable version but still on outer page it didnt reflect the stable version instead it shows the vandalised version please revert that to stable version of Citation bot mam and keep sure that to protect this pages from vandalism.Thanks.Regards a freindly editorAristocratic 536 (talk) 04:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out. It is fixed now. Best wishes and cheers! --A.S. Brown (talk) 05:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Renata. Many thanks for pointing out the problem with my citation to the management plan. I have fixed the bad URL and the missing year. I am still figuring out how to use the {{sfn}} template, and hope to get on top of that as a priority. Mike Marchmont (talk) 09:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas, I wanted to ask whether you could help me with Jonas Budrys' awards? I looked at his Lithuanian national honours and I was very confused about them. I am trying to make the article look nice, but the problem is with the Lithuanian awards and what ribbons they have. The ribbons have their own files, but the issue is what the "type" means. For example, what does "2nd type 1st class" or "1st type 3rd class" mean? Do you have any idea? Because I have no clue ;). Any help is appreciated and thank you for significantly improving the article on Jonas Budrys. Best --Itzhak Rosenberg (talk) 10:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Itzhak Rosenberg: the issue is that pre-war awards had different types/classes than the post-1990 awards. I am pretty sure the ribbons on Commons are for the modern awards. I don't know how/if the pre-war classes correlate to post-1990 classes. It would take some digging to figure out. Renata (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, even this is a step forward. Thank you for your time. Best --Itzhak Rosenberg (talk) 19:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Natalis soli invicto!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:18, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed some citations in that article, I'll try to add others that are still missing later too. Tezwoo (talk) 20:30, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In October you left a message om my talk page as below.

Please be advised that the two references in the bibliography go back to 2005, at which time there were no in-line citations related to either. Perhaps your request for clarification should have been addressed to the person that put in both references in 2005, not to me.

However, as all my in-line citations relate to "Van vlootvoogden en zeeslagen" and there are no other in-line citations to the other work, I have removed the latter Sscoulsdon (talk) 08:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Ref in Michiel de Ruyter) The article cites "Warnsinck 1941" but there are two works by this author in the same year listed in the bibliography. Therefore, it is unclear which of the works the short footnotes are referencing. Please clarify -- please add "a" and "b" to the year. See Template:Harvard_citation_no_brackets#More_than_one_work_in_a_year. Thanks, Renata (talk) 02:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this image which I just used in the related article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I invite you to express your opinion here because you are an expert in Wikipedia. Now it is more than clear for me that the Belarusian side actively attempts to establish Pahonia as an exclusively Belarusian coat of arm name (example from edit warring) and deny any connections between Pahonia and the Republic of Lithuania (despite the fact that the Poles still call the coat of arms of the Republic of Lithuania as Pogonia). Rector of the Vilnius University perfectly describes what is Pahonia (here) where he says that Pahonia is a dynasty symbol of the Gediminids which was later established as the coat of arms of Lithuania. The Belarusian websites are full of theories about "Slavic" Lithuania and Slavic Pahonia (example) which is absolutely contrary to the fact that it was created by the Balts and later expanded into the Slavic lands under the command of the ethnic Lithuanian pagan rulers . -- Pofka (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1912 in Lithuania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your current signature makes it appear that you are impersonating another user, please use your actual name in your signature. I can’t imagine that this is the first time a mistake like the one I made based on your signature at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Military Ordinariate of Lithuania has happened. Theres no reason not to use your real username. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) May I suggest you file at ANI over this deceptive signature? It is a behavioral crime of such magnitude only a full-blown multi-threaded case will do, preferably with a cast bigger than Ben-Hur. Of course, the fact that the other party hasn't edited in nearly a decade might bring it to a swift conclusion... ——Serial 19:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, how silly of me. To the nukes! Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lol @ SN54129, made my day, thanks! But there is merit to adding the 3 somehow as it has caused confusion in the past. I'll try to think of something to fix it. Renata (talk) 19:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest Renata not being active does change my understanding of the situation a bit. I was mortified that I had pinged an editor to a page in which they had no interest or involvement, if they’re not active it is much more in no harm no foul territory. That will be a lot of notification if they ever log back in though haha. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proles (Nineteen Eighty-Four) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proles (Nineteen Eighty-Four) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Caerphilly Catapults. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 1#Pride of Portree and other quidditch teams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 23:27, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Renata3:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Category:Extremely short Lithuania articles has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Flag of Lithuania for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 22:31, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:User page design center/About you#Can be converted to look like this: seems to have expired... ? New pic needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cltjames (talk • contribs) 19:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

They were actually using Broel version at this point, not Broël, just like the other branch was using Zyberk not Siberg. Also why do you change {{sfn}} to <ref>? I don't like that Marcelus (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No opinion on Broël, just seemed more correct. I changed ref format to be consistent. {{sfn}} is very useful when you need to cite multiple pages from the same printed work. When you don't need that, you only introduce two different citation formats that are very confusing for readers and required two clicks instead of one to get to actual citation info. Renata•3 22:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's valuable to have a full bibliography below the article, it's an important part of the article itself Marcelus (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Renata3,

I hope you are well. Per WP:C1, empty categories are tagged for deletion and then sit for 7 days in Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion in case there are questions about them, like if the categories have been emptied out-of-process. We know they have been unpopulated for 7 days because the 7 day period starts when they are tagged CSD C1. Even in the case of sockpuppets and ban evasion (see WP:REVERTBAN), quick deletion is not recommended. If there are other speedy deletion criteria that fit these categories, they can be deleted but in the case of categories deleted simply for being empty, we do have this 7 day rules so please tag them in the future if you come across them. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz. These categories were created in error. They deal with 1471 in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth which did not exist until 1569. I speedy deleted them as not to waste anyone's time with this. I probably should have selected G6 from the drop down. Renata•3 23:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Renata3,

I noticed that you made some edits recently on the Battle of Bucaramanga (1899) page! You wrote "resolve Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors." I have been working on pages related to the Thousand Days' War in Colombia, so most of those references were left by me. And I see that you fixed them. First, I just want to say thanks and I appreciate you checking in and fixing that. I am new to Wikipedia editing, and I'm basing my editing entirely on attempting to imitate the coding left behind on "good" military history pages. So that I don't continue making these mistakes, would you mind explaining to me what I did wrong, and what I need to do to ensure I don't keep doing it? (Also, I noticed that you went in and changed how I was citing the author's last names. I'm not sure what Wikipedia's style is, so I'll defer to you on that. However, at least in my academic writing, when you cite an author with the Spanish-style two last names, you cite both the paternal and maternal last name the first time you cite them, and then just the paternal last name every following time. So I'm under the assumption that, for instance, Plazas Olarte would be cited as just "Plazas" every citation after the first. If this is wrong on Wikipedia, though, I'll keep that in mind moving forward.)

Rafael Uribe Uribe (talk) 05:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rafael Uribe Uribe. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. For {{sfn}} template to work properly, you need to match the last name exactly to how it is cited in the full bibliography entry. If the last names don't match, then the links in the short reference will not link to the full cite.

So in this particular case, the full bibliography entry was Plazas Olarte, Guillermo (1985). La guerra civil de los Mil Días: estudio militar (in Spanish). Tunja: Academia Boyacense de Historia while the short refence was only "Plazas 1985". So when you clicked on the blue link on "Plazas 1985" nothing would happen. Now when you click on "Plazas Olarte 1985" it highlights in light blue the full bibliography entry. I have no opinion which is more appropriate to use as last name, Plazas or Plazas Olarte, but they need to match in both the long and the short footnotes.

Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Hope this helps! Renata•3 16:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Renata3! Thank you for the explanation. I really appreciate it. I'm doing my best to familiarize myself with all of the rules and norms and styles, but it's not particularly intuitive (for me) to know where to look, or to understand the more technical things. I will keep these citation rules in mind for my future edits, and I did install the script per your recommendation. What does it do? Does it automatically flag or detect the errors when I'm editing? I went in to some pages and opened the edit function, but nothing was obviously apparent to me.

EDIT/FOLLOW UP: So, I installed the script and I can see tons of errors now for the Battle of Peralonso page. But I can't understand why. I just went in and fixed it so that I mention both of the authors' surnames in the citation. But there are lots of harvnb errors and it honestly looks like I made it worse, even though I tried to imitate the edits you made on the Battle of Bucaramanga (1899) page. Rafael Uribe Uribe (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rafael Uribe Uribe. So you did fix a bunch of errors in the article. I fixed the remaining ones. There were only three remaining issues: (a) the article had full cite to "Plazas Olarte, Guillermo (1985). La guerra civil de los Mil Días" repeated eight times. When that happens, the software does not know which full cite to highlight in light blue and gives an error for duplicate citations. (b) There was a stray number 13 in ref #42 "de la Pedraja, 13 2006", and (c) "Henao 2014" was missing the second last name.

I made two other optional changes: converted citations to {{sfn}}. I think it's easier to use than <ref> tags with {{harvnb}} templates inside them. Additional benefit is that the sfn template automatically groups duplicated templates. Note how the number of footnotes went down from 86 to 53. I also changed "p=" to "pp=" to indicate page ranges. Normally, "p=" is used when citing a single page, and "pp=" is used when citing a page range or several pages.

I know citations are not easy to get the hang of, so let me know if you need more help. Renata•3 21:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Renata3. Thank you so very much for your patience with me, and for the explanations. This all makes sense. I will give the "sfn" citations a try for my next batch of edits! Meanwhile, I will reach out if I have any other issues. Thanks very much for the offer to answer any potential future questions. I appreciate it a lot! Rafael Uribe Uribe (talk) 02:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Renata•3. I'm posting here as I think something went wrong when you sorted the new entries. Eight of the new entries never made it to the sorted list. I've listed them here under Lost during sorting. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 17:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, ActivelyDisinterested. No idea what went wrong... Added the "lost" items and the others listed in the sandbox. Renata•3 23:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Renata•3. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 23:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You could have ask me as a creator of the category what it suppose to mean. It was actually rather useful Marcelus (talk) 17:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Following the death of King-elect Wilhelm Karl von Urach in 1928, his successors were entrusted to keep the pretence to the Lithuanian throne in case Lithuania would ever seek to restore its constitutional monarchy in the future. Despite the fact Wilhelm von Urach was never crowned, the Urach family still retains this title to this day. To my knowledge, Prince Inigo, as the Head of the House of Urach, remains to be the main pretender to the defunct Lithuanian throne and he never renounced it. The same goes for his predecessors. SeriousThinker 23:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SeriousThinker: please provide any reliable sources (other than fantastical speculation in media) that anyone has made any claim since 1918 to be King of Lithuania. Renata•3 22:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, there’s a difference between a regnal title and a title in pretence – they are also differently marked in templates as presented below for comparison.

Secondly, the quotes of Inigo unambiguously stating that he sees himself as a pretender ready to take accept his duty as King if the Lithuanian people him want to are literally mentioned in his article and in the article about the Lithuanian monarchs in the monarchism section. They are hard to miss.

And lastly, fantastical or not, care to explain what’s wrong with presenting decent articles from the mainstream media? These are not tabloids or opinions presented in a personal blog. Are you implying they don’t know any better? What should I present to you, pacta conventa? I highly doubt there are many academic sources on someone being a titular monarch of a non-existent monarchy. For further investigation, go to Heads of former ruling families. SeriousThinker 12:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SeriousThinker: once again, please provide any reliable sources (other than fantastical speculation in media) that anyone has made any claim since 1918 to be King of Lithuania. Inigo saying that he would be happy to serve as a king is a far cry from declaring "I am the rightful King! Your president is illegitimate." Even if you could stretch that single quote from a media interview, there is zero evidence that any of his predecessors ever made any claims or statements regarding the throne. Renata•3 00:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope all well on your end. As I think you've noticed (and many thanks for correcting my errors), I have some difficulty in the use of names derived from Lithuanian-language sources, in part due to grammar and in part due difficulty to navigate when Lithuanian proper name or when a Lithuanized version of a Russian, Jewish or Polish name. In the Vaitkevičius (1967) reference is come across the foot-note iš kontrrevoliucijos rankų pavyko išplėšti 24 Kauno Darbininkų atstovų tarybos narius bei aktyvistus: B. Petniūną, B. Mickevičių, V. Griškelį, L. Zaliną, A. Pševodskj, V. Zenkevičių, A. Gadusą ir kt." I think I name the names of the first four names into English, but less sure on the latter three. Pševodskj seems to be a typo of a transliteration of a Slavic name (Polish or Russian?), 'Zenkevičių' should be Zenkevičius (Vytauto Zenkevičiaus?) but for 'A. Gadusą' I come up with nothing (in index, listed as 'A. Gadusas'). --Soman (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Soman, I looked into the names. (Sorry it's so late, have been crazy busy in real life). They are so obscure that they don't even really show up in communist literature. I have removed them from the article as trivia. Renata•3 03:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Renata, you are my Godmother in Wikipedia who have welcomed me onboard in 2006 (I hope I am not mistaken). I plead for your help to establish the seemingly obvious: the notability criteria of director Emilis Velyvis. My current battleground is User_talk:Onel5969#Emilis_Velyvis_notability. Verily yours, User:Ttk371 — Preceding undated comment added 00:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy New Year!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:04, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Labas, thanks for reviewing the article. RE Talk:Rokas Baciuška#Proposed merge of Draft:Rokas Baciuška into Rokas Baciuška. I took some of the material from the draft when creating this article, so there is not much to merge. Can you delete the draft article? --Wolfmartyn (talk) 14:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you have a time, can you take a look at this issue and comment? Link: Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_Lithuania#RfC:_content_of_the_section_on_Belarus. Cheers Marcelus (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you have recently made edits in articles concerning Lithuanian military units. I was thinking about creating a Lithuanian military history task force within the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. Would you be interested in joining? If enough people are supportive of this idea, then I would create it. Cukrakalnis (talk) 13:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cukrakalnis, I am not particularly interested in military history. I edit what catches my attention and interest at that moment. I wish you luck with the taskforce, but I don't think I will be joining it. Renata•3 19:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, no problem. Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Many thanks for the edit on the Yitzhak Weinstein-Branovski article. I came across the source stating the following, and I'm bit lost in translation: "drg. Vainšteinąs Aizikas — inteligentas, buvęs bundietis iki 1905 m., dirbo Vilniuje". Did he leave the Bund in 1905? (which would have been at the age of 17... so very early) or join the Bund in 1905? And the 'dirbu Vilniuje' would have implied professional work (i.e. that he had lived in the city before) or had been politically active there in the past? -- Soman (talk) 01:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Soman. Hmmm... it's unclear. The issue is the placement of the comma:

• "drg. Vainšteinas Aizikas — inteligentas, buvęs bundietis iki 1905 m., dirbo Vilniuje" -- does imply that he left the Bund in 1905 (could make sense given the revolution in 1905, but you are right that he would be very young) and "worked in Vilnius" -- but says absolutely nothing about what/when he was doing in Vilnius. I.e. cannot infer if it was party work or some factory work ("inteligentas" would imply it was party work but that's just conjecture).
• "drg. Vainšteinas Aizikas — inteligentas, buvęs bundietis, iki 1905 m. dirbo Vilniuje" -- would mean that he at some unspecified time left the Bund and that prior to 1905 worked in Vilnius.

To make matters more confusing, I just checked Lietuviškoji tarybinė enciklopedija which says absolutely nothing about his pre-1918 activities, but says he was killed in 1941 during WWII near Moscow... Renata•3 21:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Writers Barnstar
		Amazing work on Augustinas Janulaitis; I came across it while patrolling some new pages. Excellent, informative and detailed article. Seriously, you should go nominate it for DYK or something. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 05:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	great work, on article on Willi Ahrem! Sm8900 (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For 50th Reserve Rifle Division!! Amazing work!! To say hi to the rest of the Red Army editor's group, feel free to come by User talk:Tai3chinirv7ana. Wreck Smurfy is our expert on Red Army rifle divisions. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 July 31 § Treasure troves by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. + Qwerfjkltalk 17:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:MobileDiff/152974204 https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contribuciones/186.11.123.149 https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_discusión:MajinBaki

I contributed a lot to the mu online article in Spanish and LuchoCR just for having contributed without vandalism blocked me forever from Wikipedia, you can review the changes I made on the page and I asked them in a good way to remove the block since I had not done anything and instead they gave me a 13-day block and then for asking librarians for help in Spanish they undid my changes asking for help on their discussion pages and they blocked me forever, the librarian Taichi is complicit I asked for help with this user https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_discusión:MajinBaki who is 3 years old and they blocked my IP forever without having done anything https://es.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&redlink=1&title=User_discussion:186.11.123.149 Taichi deleted my discussion page where I put the unlock template explaining everything and rightly put that it was unnecessary, just to delete it, vandalizing my page discussion page Here is an example of the help I asked a librarian in Spanish on the subject and the ocelot librarian as a mafioso reverted the changes https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:MobileDiff/152986729 and asked my ip ban without doing anything, I just ask for help to do justice, the user Ocelot asked for my IP ban and the mafia user LuchoCR thanked him for reverting my help changes on librarian pages and said yes to me ip ban requested by ocelot https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tablón_de_anuncios_de_los_bibliotecarios/Portal/Archivo/Nombres_inapropiados_y_vandalismo_persistente/Actual?markasread=52216326&markasreadwiki=eswiki#c-Ocelot-2023081016300 0-Block_Breach_10 there is a mob on wikipedia in Spanish that is why I ask you for help, please translate everything that appears in the links that I send you so that you understand MajinBaki (talk) 20:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Lithuania/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In this edit, you changed the source sentence "The party contested the first 1922 parliamentary elections, receiving 2.1% of the vote and winning three seats" to "The party contested the first 1922 parliamentary elections, receiving 2.1% of the vote and winning no seats" However, you left it sourced to the original source, which if checked, would reveal your amended text to be untrue. Please remember to change sources when changing sourced information. Cheers, Number 57 08:42, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Renata3:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1900 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Following on from the AfD discussion, I'm going to create a page for this person, but it appears he's most commonly known as he:יצחק רפאל עציון (Yitzhak Etzion), which is the name adopted once he started living in Mandate Palestine/Israel. I'm thinking to create two redirects from the names above. Ping me, if you think otherwise. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 07:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for tidying up Vladas Putviskis :-) My apologies for my lack of familiarity with the proper usage for double-barrel names like his. Post-Cultural (talk) 02:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for your edits at Vilnius Central Business District.
Happy holidays Renata! 🎄❄️

The force of ikigai (talk) 08:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1944 establishments in Lithuania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, In lt-wiki I see that lt:Pranas Mašiotas had father Jonas Mašiotas , son lt:Jonas Mašiotas (1897) and brother, also named Jonas. Kind of unusual :-) but happens. Are there any sources that his father's name was Jonas? - Altenmann >talk 06:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Altenmann. Yes, this website by a public library in Marijampolė lists his father as Jonas (1832–1905) and his son as Jonas (1897–1953). It does not list the brother. Renata•3 04:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Renata3 - I just wanted to say thank you very much for your edits on Vladas Putviskis. I am grateful that article was able to be filled in, because I felt I left in it such a poor state. You inspire me to be more active on wikipedia when I am done with my degree! Post-Cultural (talk) 10:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Szigetvár has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject of the article is clearly notable, however, it should be written far less promotionally, as currently, it reads more like an "about us" section than an encyclopedic article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lithuanian Days and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Renata3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OhHaiMark (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Next month, the WP:Women in Green WikiProject is going to have an edit-a-thon, where we're hoping to get women's biographies from different countries nominated as good articles. I happened to find your work at Marcelė Kubiliūtė while looking through biographies, so I wanted to let you know in case you had any interest in joining and nominating so we have some representation for Lithuania. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I started writing Marta Zauniūtė and i have a question or two. I saw you created the article Dovas Zaunius. They are described to live in Rokaičiai, but the German names are given either An Rokaiten or Rokaiten. Thre are two close by but different locations. (You have to click at the map here to see the old map.) How can we establish which is the correct place? Anoither question, which is correct , Marta or Morta. Universal Lithuanian Encyclopedia says Marta. Some other sources say Morta. --Altenmann >talk 01:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Varpas data say Rokaiten per Neukirch, Ostpreusen and Am Rokaiten is closer to Neukirch (now Timiryazevo, Slavsky District [ru]) than Rokaiten. --Altenmann >talk 02:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Altenmann, I am really not sure. I checked my sources and they don't specify only say "Rokaičiai" in Lithuanian. Found his German name (David Saunus) and that comes up election results to Reichstag that say "zu Rokaiten". So I think it might be Rokaiten, not An Rokaiten. You'd have to dig up census data or birth records to say for sure this out but that's WP:OR. But I also think it doesn't really matter either way. The two villages were about 1km apart and neither exists today.

As for Morta vs. Marta. It looks to be different levels of Lithuanization of her German name Martha Saunus. Morta is far more common Lithuanian name (cf. Morta of Lithuania). Marta seems to be trying to more closely follow the spelling of the German name. Morta is older and therefore yields more results. Marta looks to be newer and thus not as many google results. I would defer to the Universal Lithuanian Encyclopedia and use the same name. Renata•3 23:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Mazeikiai district map.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Small, low quality. Better files at c:Category:Maps of Mažeikiai District Municipality.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 01:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Io, Saturnalia!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:24, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]