User talk:Rogue 9

This page was nominated for deletion on 21 August 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

Just demonstrating how this works. When people post in your profile discussion page, you get a notification on it. Alyeska 00:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rogue 9, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! This link is Broken 01:05, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

/Archive 1

/Archive 2

Looks like wikipedia administrators finally realized he wasn't very fair or accurate, after all.  ;-) Unfortunately it took several months longer than it reasonably should have. Lawyer2b 15:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What can I say? The wheels of justice, they turn slowly, but they're still faster than the Wikipedia bureaucracy. :p This is the first I've heard of it; I've been avoiding political articles lately. Rogue 9 07:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you unblock User: Anarcho-capitalism who was blocked as being thought of as Billy Ego's sock-puppet.

I was wondering if you could look over User: Instantiayion, he was also banned as a Billy Ego sock-puppet, I was having a debate with him over in Talk:Planned economy that I'm pretty sure was about to be resolved until the sudden ban.

Thanks, Fephisto 12:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um... What? I'm not an administrator; I can't unblock anyone. I'm not saying I wouldn't have in that case, seeing how the evidence against him was flimsy at best, but I'm afraid you've got the wrong guy. Rogue 9 09:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, sorry. I probably could've saved myself some ebarassment by checking whether or not you were actually an administrator. Well, in my defense, and take this as a compliment, you sure do act like one. Fephisto 16:44, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Roguelogo1.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo!

Man, what are the odds of finding you here, via a userpage for some guy being a jerk on some page called RONJA (I dont' know what that's about, either), which I found through LED, which I don't know how I got to.

Wikipedia is fun! --Phant 20:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Out of curiosity, whose userpage did you find me through? I've dealt with a lot of people on here, and don't remember ever reading the article on RONJA before. Rogue 9 04:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, no idea. I don't remember anymore =/--Phant 07:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

• Image:No Karl Marx.JPG

Thank you.

Didn't list too long now did it? Alyeska 21:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have initiated a deletion review of an AFD which you were involved in. You may wish to contribute to the discussion. Balancer 04:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As a member of WP:40K I ask you to share your thoughts and opinions on a matter that I feel will shape the future of the project. Thanks. --Falcorian ^(talk) 02:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You once voted to Keep the noob, if you are still around, the noob article has been up for three months, and is back in a AFD again. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_noob. Could use your help if you feel like adding another "keep". Timmccloud (talk) 19:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your observations about the height of an AT-AT -- scale of Luke, and so on -- is original research. If you can cite a reliable source that offers ambiguity about the height or even a different figure, then cite it. Regardless, please stop inserting your personal interpretation. --EEMIV (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a personal interpretation; the numbers do not lie. (West End Games, however, either does or just doesn't care if they're right.) Regardless, I can cite numerous sources, starting with the Star Wars Technical Commentaries by Dr. Curtis Saxton. Rogue 9 (talk) 18:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a response on the Walker talk page. FYI, it's generally unnecessary to copy-and-paste talk-page responses to the initiating user's page; folks who leave comments generally will keep that page on their watchlist to catch a reply. --EEMIV (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Red Knight (Forgotten Realms), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Red Knight (Forgotten Realms). Agamemnon2 (talk) 10:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I found your name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians against censorship/Members and I was wondering if you might want to participate in a debate I have started at deletion review of this category and accompanying userboxes here.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 01:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Forgotten Realms, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Forgotten Realms and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Forgotten Realms during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gavin Collins (talk) 08:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A while ago I was told that being a theist was a non-defining and trivial characteristic. If being a theist is a non-defining and trivial characteristic how can being an atheist be any differnt save for atheist activists and thinkers who already have their own Category?

I need you Rogue 9 to both vote with me [1] and get others to do the same. --Blackeagles (talk) 18:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may need it, but you can't have it. I'm not interested in pursuing some sort of vendetta against atheists if that's what you're after; if it isn't then I'm not interested in going about deleting stuff either. Rogue 9 (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimately, Blackeagles was judged to be a sockpuppet of Grazon, and the Blackeagles account was indefinitely blocked. —SlamDiego_←T 02:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Lathander, an article you have been involved in editing, has been nominated for deletion. If there is anything you can do to improve the article so that it may be kept, please do so.  :) BOZ (talk) 23:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protonk (talk) 05:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Sent with Auto Wiki Browser to all 40K project members.[reply]

This message is a test to check to see if members of the Warhammer 40K Project are still online, active and interested in helping the project. If you are no longer interested in the project all you need to do is...nothing! If you don't respond to this I'll take your name off the list and you'll never here from us again. If you're the proactive type you can remove the name yourself or talk to me and I'll do it.

If you are still interested in helping out the 40K project or otherwise still want to be listed there you can say so in response to this message on your talk page or on mine. Alternately you can add our new userbox ({{User WikiProject Warhammer 40,000}}) to your userpage and I'll take that as a response. The userpage doesn't automatically include people in a category of members yet, but it might in the future.

We've assessed most of the articles in the project on the Version 1.0 assessment scale (the table on the project page should take a few days to update) but we need to push to get the core articles in the project up to GA status. Thanks for all your help. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help the project along. Protonk (talk) 21:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still in. Actually, thanks for reminding me; it's once again time for typo patrol. I'm the project copyeditor. Rogue 9 (talk) 22:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'll be, here it is. XD Rogue 9 (talk) 02:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kerry Medal.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rogue 9. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Article Rescue Members are not necessarily inclusionists, all wikipedians are warmly welcome to join.~~~~

I too hate Barney. As I got older I started to realize how disgustingly insipid and selfish the purple dork really is. Angie Y. (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Malar (Forgotten Realms) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable - no third party sourcing

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- The Red Pen of Doom 04:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I mentioned a few of your talk page edits at WP:AN#Need some talk page edits looked at for possible deletion, per WP:BLP, as possible candidates for deletion per Wikipedias policy on Biographies of living persons. As such, you can't call living persons "Nutcases" and "Ideologues".--JOJ ^Hutton 02:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He is and he is. If you wish I can go into detail; suffice to say he advocates a position that would be the destruction of liberty under the guise of serving its cause. If the government of the United States had done as he wished in 1860-61, it would have been the end of republican government in the world. That's nut covered. As for ideologue, ideology permeates everything he writes; he starts with his conclusion in mind and then goes hunting for evidence rather than the other way around. That is not how you perform academic inquiry. Rogue 9 (talk) 02:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you feel so or not should be kept to yourself and not broadcast on Wikipedia. It violates our policy on Biographies of living people. Consider this the first warning. Any more attempts at violating BLP will receive additional warnings, and an inevitable report to the BLP notice board.--JOJ ^Hutton 03:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on the noticeboard, if they need to be deleted for policy reasons, I have no objection. This does not mean I concede their content. Rogue 9 (talk) 03:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine that you feel that way. You can believe anything you wish. Its just that BLP is one of the more serious issues that Wikipedia deals with, and is usually taken very seriously.--JOJ ^Hutton 03:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And that's fine. I'm not trying to argue the point. :) I hope you have a good evening; it's quite late here in the Eastern time zone, so I'm out. Rogue 9 (talk) 03:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't worry too much about it, Rogue 9. It's a very common misconception for people to have with regards to BLP, in that it applies to all pages on Wikipedia, and not just articles. From now on, make sure to reign in your opinions about people and avoid making any statements that could be perceived as slanderous. I'm confident you've learned from this and will not make that mistake again. =) Kurtis (talk) 04:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My thanks. I certainly have. The whole thing strikes me as a bit paranoid (people say what I wrote and far worse without being brought to trial for slander), but I'm happy to follow the server rules. Rogue 9 (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eldath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eldath until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 23:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Knight (Forgotten Realms) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Knight (Forgotten Realms) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 18:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you are concerned about deletions started by TTN, this nominator has started several dozen of them in the past few weeks. BOZ (talk) 14:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garagos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garagos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tempus (Forgotten Realms) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tempus (Forgotten Realms) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 20:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please remove this red category from your user page? It interferes with the management of the category system.Rathfelder (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have instituted what seems to be the current mutually acceptable workaround. Sorry for any trouble. Rogue 9 (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rogue 9. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Speaking of truth, the truth isn't neutral either. Articles should be as neutrally toned as possible, but frankly to take a neutral stance on some things (the Holocaust, for instance) is morally reprehensible in itself. In the interests of academic tone we need not spend an entire article condemning such subjects, but we should neither offer justifications in the article, as absolute neutrality requires we must. I will not be party to justifying Stalin, Pol Pot, or any others of their ilk in the name of being neutral."

That's not really what the neutrality policy says, is it? Benjamin (talk) 09:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, I forget what I said that on, though at a guess probably in response to a neo-Confederate attempting to whitewash the Confederacy by using the neutrality policy to suppress the role of slavery in the Civil War, which frequently happens. So no, it doesn't actually say that, but people trying to hide an odious agenda prefer to pretend it does. Rogue 9 (talk) 03:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rogue 9. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Talos (Forgotten Realms) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sune (Forgotten Realms) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rogue 9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am caught in an IP range block and have done nothing wrong.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 11:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The instructions for using this template do not say to give the IP. 216.49.117.37. Rogue 9 (talk) 21:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My IP range seems to be blocked from editing for reasons unknown to me. I am attempting to make a grammatical correction to Third Enforcement Act. Rogue 9 (talk) 03:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rogue 9, Are you using a VPN? Or proxy or Tor browser? If so, those will need to be turned off, your cache cleared, and within 24 hours you should be able to edit again. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 04:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CaptainEek No, I am not. I'm on Firefox on my unmodified Internet connection through my local ISP. Rogue 9 (talk) 21:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The problem seems to have resolved itself. I made no changes to my browser since last night, but whatever, I'll take it. Rogue 9 (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rogue 9. Wikipedia:WikiProject Inclusion is believed to be inactive. It looks like you sympathize with inclusionism, but do not take an active role in this project. Thus, I will move you to the list of inactive participants after a month. Feel free to move back to the list of active participants when you are ready to contribute. 84.120.7.178 (talk) 09:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And you are, Mr. IP? Rogue 9 (talk) 20:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am 84.120.7.178, de facto maintainer of this WikiProject. 84.120.7.178 (talk) 10:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No you aren't. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Inclusion#Status as of 2020. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rogue 9. Having in mind that you created User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/CSA denied (as well as File:Confederate Third National Flag - Cancelled.png, which I took the liberty to use), maybe you will be interested to display userboxes that I recently created; you may see them at Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/New Userboxes#July 11, 2021. —Sundostund (talk) 21:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/Delete deletionists, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/Delete deletionists and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/Delete deletionists during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 15:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rogue 9, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rogue 9 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Rogue 9 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/VRWC, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/VRWC and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/VRWC during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 23:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/French drivers, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/French drivers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Rogue 9/Userboxes/French drivers during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 23:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thank you for courteously removing the contentious material from your userpage. I’m sorry I acted out of process and caused undue stress. Dronebogus (talk) 18:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Heaven's Gate (religious group and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Heaven's Gate (religious group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Garagos has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 25 § Garagos until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck to Ostrander's Mutineers in their scavenger hunt. :) Rogue 9 (talk) 00:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Greater Power has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 30 § Greater Power until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]