User talk:Terrainman

Welcome to my Talk page --𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 11:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Archive 1

Hi Terrainman, thankyou for reviewing June. Given this is your first review, would you mind dropping a note at WP:GAMENTOR before you continue to ensure that the criteria is reviewed in line with GA expectations? Thankyou again. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 15:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support on talk in Soviet space program. The dispute over this article was completely biased by ilenart626. As you can see from the diff in July 2022 there was much more content about the German influence. This user then started (and linked) a new article, German influence on the Soviet space program, later renamed to German influence on Soviet rocketry. From the beginning, he disparaged the German influence as "marginal after 1947". Several "edit wars" and sources contributed by me did not lead to anything before he banned me for WP:COI and initiated other attacks in Autumn 2023. For further steps in the latest dispute see this talk. SchmiAlf (talk) 10:53, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TylerBurden (talk) 17:46, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The end of the mandate and declaration were contemporaneous events. Selfstudier (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I guess I confused it with the announcement of the Palestine act. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 12:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Terrainman. Thank you for your work on Polyot (satellite). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Terrainman, I noticed you opened a review on Talk:June/GA2 but have not added to it. Are you able to do a full review? If not that isn't a problem, it can be relisted for a new reviewer, no problem. Best, CMD (talk) 08:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"it can be relisted for a new reviewer" Yes, that would be best. I was unsure how to retract it, however I do not think I can complete the review. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 18:05, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, all the best, CMD (talk) 01:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Terrainman, for being qualified as independant, a person not only have to be outside of party membership but also need to be independant meaning not having relation with it or preference for it. In that case, Elon Musk IS dependant to the GOP, he donate exclusivity to them, he's militating for them, he is present in internal meetings... 142.169.16.180 (talk) 02:18, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that he is obviously affiliated with the party to some degree. However I believe there is a difference between being affiliated with a party and being a member of that party. On wikipedia there is no Original research, meaning you'll need to provide a source which says he is a member of the GOP if you wish to set his party as that on the infobox. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 11:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/06/10/elon-musk-twitter-republican-00038671 as i read it says he's republican. It's not my original POV. As far as i know, politico are pretty much professional and reputable as politics sources. 142.169.16.134 (talk) 02:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but again the source does not say he's a member of the GOP. It characterizes him as a republican, but I think that is different than being a member of the party. If you could provide another source which says he is I will look at it also. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 14:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need to be a card/registered member of a party to be a member/militant of it. It's your actions that define it, not who you are (Ak what you have). 142.169.16.254 (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're unconvinced, it might be best to open a discussion on the articles talk page so others can chime in. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The part i've modified has been totally replaced (No in the article anymore.) so it's more for a matter of finding what happened that i'm here. But i think we did the round so i hope you a nice year but it's seems we will need it ! (I'm in Québec...) 142.169.16.248 (talk) 07:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it has come to my attention that you reverted a change fixing transphobia on the wiki site for breasts. As for your comment, no; femboys rarely, if ever receive HRT, as they still identify as male. The best way to phrase this would be transfeminine person, as it is both factually correct and neutral, regardless of gender identity. 91.44.216.134 (talk) 01:13, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]