User talk:Tomobe03/Archive02

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tomobe03. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Pakrac clash at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:09, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		I am delighted to present you with this WikiProject Barnstar in recognition of your extensive contributions to the Military history WikiProject, as evidenced by your being nominated for the 2013 "Military historian of the Year" award. We're grateful for your help and look forward to seeing more of your excellent work in the coming year. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

The article Dalj massacre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dalj massacre for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dana boomer -- Dana boomer (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

The article Operation Vrbas '92 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Operation Vrbas '92 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

The article Zrinski Battalion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Zrinski Battalion for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

The article Operation Vrbas '92 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Vrbas '92 for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

The article Battle of Kupres (1992) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Kupres (1992) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03,

As someone who has previously worked on road articles, you may be interested in participating in the 2014 HWY Cup (a similar concept to WP:WikiCup, but for road and highway articles). The exact rules are not yet determined, but will include points for article improvements such as expanding stubs. If you think you might be interested, you should signup at User:TCN7JM/HWY Cup 2014. Cheers, Evad37 [talk] 05:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

The article Zrinski Battalion you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Zrinski Battalion for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Disregard, I reverted and replaced the hold per your comment. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Below are the suggestions you made during your Good article review of the Mahan-class destroyer on 28 November 2013.

“While the table in the "Ships in class" section is referenced just fine (no action required), I'd suggest adding another column to the table named "Source" and moving references to that column (only reference). That would reduce clutter since each field in every row is referenced to the same document. I'd also suggest prevent wrapping of dates and hull numbers in the table by adding nowrap=yes parameter to one field in each column (one with the longest text, of course).”

• I added a Source column to the chart, and moved the references to this column.
• As for the wrapping of dates and hulls numbers, I’m still stumbling around with it. Would you have time to give me a tutorial on the subject, or refer me to some Wikipedia instructions?

Thank you. Pendright (talk) 01:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article Battle of Gospić. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. Blackmane (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

hello!

I have a question. I came across this sentence during my copy edit

By the end of September, Croatian defensive positions around Otočac were shored up, allowing minor attacks—largely in area of village of Drenov Klanac

I'm not entirely sure what meaning was being attempted here. Is it meant to imply that

1. the defensive positions were shored up thus only allowing attacks to get through? or
2. the defensive positions were shored up and used as staging posts for minor attacks?
3. some other meaning.

Thanks for clarifying this. Blackmane (talk) 16:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Hm, "allowing" is completely misused here. I meant to say the defensive positions were reinforced or otherwise improved but the opposing force launched only minor attacks (i.e. no major offensive) in the area specified. Thanks for pointing this out as well as for all the copyedits.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

I see! Well, that's all cleared up. I'll finish that last edit up and that'll be the copyedit done. If you don't mind having a read through, that would be much appreciated. Blackmane (talk) 21:00, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

I read the article once again, and fixed one issue. No qualms otherwise. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

I've closed the request at WP:GOCE. As a suggestion, you may wish to have a GA reviewer look over it again. I'll go and tidy up the tags on the article. Blackmane (talk) 15:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Could you have another look at the article? I believe I've addressed your assessment comments way back from Feb 2013, so hopefully it now meets B1 and B2 and is up to B class now. GregorB (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

All clear save for one missing cite. (pun intended) --Tomobe03 (talk) 22:28, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Got it, could you take a look? GregorB (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

All clear, nice work.--Tomobe03 (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! GregorB (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

"The city administered area covers 1.1% of territory" is cited to the 2011 Yearbook, p. 41, but I couldn't find it there, could you take a look? I'm retiring this template in favor of {{Croatia Yearbook 2013}}. GregorB (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Good catch - should be page 56.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Um, still can't find (or derive) the figure from the content there... GregorB (talk) 09:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Just take a look at table 2-2 (Counties, surface area, population, towns, municipalities and settlements), and then some math is required to calculate 641/56594=1.1%. Mind you p56 of the yearbook itself is p58 of the PDF.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Aargh, thanks, I misunderstood the sentence - it refers to Zagreb only, not to total city-administered area of Croatia. GregorB (talk) 13:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Siege of Dubrovnik at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

The article Battle of Kupres (1992) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Kupres (1992) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

The article Operation Corridor 92 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Corridor 92 for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar! I can assure you that at this point i'm not planning on stopping. Next up for completion is the Silba-class (on my sandbox page) and getting Split (VPBR-31) to meet the B-class criteria. I also planned on making a template like this to make the content more "visible" and easier to navigate around.--Saxum (talk) 14:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saborsko massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23 editor -- 23 editor (talk) 21:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

The article Saborsko massacre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Saborsko massacre for things which need to be addressed. 23 editor (talk) 21:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

The article Saborsko massacre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saborsko massacre for comments about the article. Well done! 23 editor (talk) 19:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

The article Saborsko massacre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saborsko massacre for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23 editor -- 23 editor (talk) 21:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

I need a bit of advice regarding a list I started on my sandbox page. The plan is to list every ship that was in service with the JRM (planning on doing the same for the HRM). I was wondering, would it be better if I continued as started, using a ref right next to the claim, or should I just create a new column at the end and "gather" all the refs of that particular class in one place?--Saxum (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

If a single reference covers all items contained in a table, it may be placed next to table caption or in the final row after an introductory line such as "Source: XYZ". If a single reference covers all items in a given column/row, it may be placed next to the specific column/row header. Failing either of those, I'd place one ref next to each claim. There are alternative solutions, such as a "Sources" column, but I'm not too fond of those.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:34, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Logorište you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 08:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Croatian EU membership referendum has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 12:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

The article Battle of Logorište you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Logorište for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 18:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Battle of Borovo Selo at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Operation Swath-10 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 17:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for taking on the review. I just wanted to give you a heads up about recently moving in info from Kronan (ship) due to suggestions related to an ongoing peer review.

Peter ^Isotalo 20:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Alas, not really related to tabs... I've been trying to make the section headers look less atrocious, but this seems to be unusually difficult to achieve.

In a way, it is related to tabs in a sense that the current layout can't be salvaged, so tabbed layout seems inevitable. Hell, I could have been almost finished with it by now, given the time I wasted on tweaking. :-P GregorB (talk) 14:07, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Is it close to working? GregorB (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, the basic setup is simple enough. However, it is difficult to make it work big-bang-style, due to a large number of related subpages. Maybe there is a way to introduce it gradually, using a "hybrid" design before everything is finished... GregorB (talk) 15:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Absolutely, great artists steal. :-) There's also WP:GA, for example. Didn't study how it works, but it doesn't really matter - we should simply adopt whatever works best. GregorB (talk) 15:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Of course, why not? I'll take a closer look and see what might work for us. GregorB (talk) 16:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

This is the list of all subpages. Basically they all fall into one of four categories:

• Tabs
• Subpages (should merely be linked to from somewhere)
• Zagreb TF
• Obsolete, unused and miscellaneous stuff

I'll get back to you with a more concrete suggestion regarding the layout. GregorB (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Battle of Zadar at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 17:35, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03, I've removed your copy-edit request for Battle of the Dalmatian Channels here because you already have two requests pending. We have a maximum of two requests per editor at any one time, which was changed on March 16 to help reduce our backlog of requests. Please feel free to re-add the request once one of your requests has been fulfilled. Sorry for any inconvenience and thanks for your understanding. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:28, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

No sweat. The last limit I remembered was three articles per editor and I missed that last change. I thought the queue was unusually short though :) I'll simply repost the request later on, cheers!--Tomobe03 (talk) 08:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Here is how I see it...

There are only six "important" sections:

• Announcements
• Article alerts
• Assessment
• Participants
• Recent Articles
• To Do List

The rest is static, non-essential, and can be dealt with later.

Your layout envisions five tabs:

• Main page = Present main page minus non-essential stuff
• Discussion = Simply a link to the talk page
• News & open tasks = Announcements, Article alerts, To Do List (is this too busy for a single tab?)
• Assessment = Assessment section (subpage)
• Participants = Participants section (subpage)

"Non-essential stuff" for the main page is certainly Participants, very likely To Do List.

The gradualist approach would be:

1. Introduce tabs (not necessarily all of them at once)
2. Tweak the subpages while moving/retiring content from the main page
3. Iterate #2 until we have a satisfactory design

Not that easy to do, but there are no deadlines either. I'd be willing to participate. GregorB (talk) 14:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Just one question regarding citing something in this list im working on. I stumbled upon this old newspaper article. As you can see the interview was published in Slobodna Dalmacija with a date in the upper right corner. Whats not known is the author and is this a regular article in SD or a special subsection. With this in mind i'm not sure if it's good enough to be used as a source? --Saxum (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

I don't see anything wrong with the source, author names are not always included in newspaper articles for one reason or another. Furthermore, there's nothing to indicate that the article was published in anything other than a regular issue of SD. If I were you, I'd use the source and cite it as:

• "I mi smo Mornarica". Slobodna Dalmacija (in Croatian). 12 March 1988. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

Excellent stuff. I thought having three large sections in this page may be too much, but it doesn't appear so.

Assessment and Participants should be easy to do, and this one was probably not that hard either...

I'm all for recognized content; I didn't know there was a way to have it maintained by a bot - that's even better.

Happy holidays to you too Tomobe ! GregorB (talk) 11:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Bold is the word! :-) Very nice - I hope feedback will be positive. GregorB (talk) 00:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

You know, back in the day I did some web design (or development, rather). Maybe you have similar experiences; if not, you wouldn't believe how hard it is to get an unanimously positive feedback when redesigning a website. No matter how retarded the old design was, some people will always think it's better. Even if the new design were able to materialize naked hookers bringing in bags of money into one's living room, some people would still be unhappy with it. :-D That being said, I can only agree with you here. :-) GregorB (talk) 00:48, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Erdut massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dana boomer -- Dana boomer (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Where can I ask for a new review and a quality grading for an article within the WikiProject Croatia? Specifically for the article Duchy of Croatia. Tzowu (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, thank you, I made some edits according to your suggestions, at least those required for a B-class rating. Also, can I change a start class article to a C-class even if I worked on it (like Domagoj of Croatia)? Tzowu (talk) 21:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

The article Erdut massacre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Erdut massacre for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dana boomer -- Dana boomer (talk) 21:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Can you tell me why you reverted my edit?Where in the link is mentioned 688 000?Can you please tell me because i don't see it.I just see 790 000 number.Thank you. Also in the text above populations it says like this:"Ten municipalities where the city is situated have combined population of 1,283,783 as suburban settlements are added, while the Belgrade metropolitan area encompasses population of 1,639,121.[53] Zagreb is the second largest city on the river, comprising population of 688,163 living in the city itself, and 790,017 in the city-administered area.[54] Together with the Zagreb County, largely corresponding to various definitions of the city's metropolitan area,[55] it has a combined population of 1,110,517.[54].But for Belgrade under Municipal population the number is from it's Metropolitan population.Andunder Zagreb municipal population or Metro population the number is just from City of Zagreb population not it's Metro poulation.The numbers are not correct.So i will put the number as they are in the text above.No double standards.Cheers Scrosby85 (talk) 23:35, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

City of Zagreb has a population of 790 000..Metro has over 1 mil...How can then be that Belgrade Municipality has 1.7 mil?It is a bit unrealistic compared to Zagreb.It turns out that Belgrade has 1 mil more people than Zagreb.That is not the case..Belgrade Metro or District has 1.65 mil not Municipality.If you would like to change that once again you can put 688 000 people just for Urban but 1 110 000 for Municipality.Like Belgrade has but that is a population of it's Metro not Municipality. Scrosby85 (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm not increasing numbers just because it seems like Belgrade have 1 mil more population than Zagreb.I'm just adding numbers which are quoted in the text above...Because number under Belgrade is his Metro area not Municipality..Like quoted in that text "while the Belgrade metropolitan area encompasses population of 1,639,121.[53]"...You get what i want to say? Scrosby85 (talk) 22:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

I asked you to show me where in the source is Belgrade municipal population,Metro population and District population.I think you also don't know what are you trying to say here.In this case Municipal population of Belgrade is bigger than Metro population..But Municipal population is not Metro population because it is 20 000 difference.Where is the logic?What qualify under Urban,Municipality,County,Metro..You can define it how you want it. Scrosby85 (talk) 00:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

I did not say that sources are wrong..I just asked you where in that sources is pointed what is the population of Municipality,of Metro and Cities itself. Scrosby85 (talk) 22:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lovas massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

The article Lovas massacre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lovas massacre for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:20, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

The article Lovas massacre you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lovas massacre for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 15:21, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Well, normally I'd be quite interested, but for me it would be difficult not to use the access granted to me knowing that someone else could have got it had I not applied. In a way, it almost creates a commitment (even if the number of accounts is not limited), and I've been trying - especially lately, since my "unretirement" - to disengage a bit from wikiwork. It's working out just fine for me at the moment, so why risk it? :) Thanks for dropping a note! GregorB (talk) 10:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atlantic Grupa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Grupa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 22:28, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Nikkimaria (talk) 02:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Hi I took up your GOCE request on this article and have finished going through it. I'd appreciate it if you have a look over it. Blackmane (talk) 19:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Battle of the Dalmatian Channels at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Dear user, there is an ongoing RfC on Dalmatia. You might want to participate. --Silvio1973 (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Dear User as you know Director and myself experience often difficulties in communication. For this reason I have filed a RfC/U to discuss about this problem. I must confess that I genuinely believe he deals with me with improper language (inaccaptable, regardeless of the difficulties of communication we experienced). I did not file an AN/I because I would like to have a large discussion about this issue. And may be I am the guilty one.

If you want to partecipate to the discussion as a "User who tried and failed to resolve the dispute" or "Additional user endorsing this cause for concern") you can do at [[1]].

To avoid the suspicion of canvassing I am contacting all the users involved in the previous and present dispute. If you think I forgote someone please tell me. Silvio1973 (talk) 12:44, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Actually, not at all - my objective here was simply to push the article past the DYK line, even if I did overshoot that target a bit. I wanted to try doing a couple of GAs (Perković and Stublić are prime candidates), but right now to me that feels more like something that ought to be done, rather than something I'd actually enjoy doing. I'm in a DYK mood at the moment. :-) GregorB (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vance plan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

The article Vance plan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vance plan for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

The article Vance plan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vance plan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I have a question regarding the names of navy related articles. I'm familiar that ship classes are written with cursive follwed by a dash and a short explanation, for instance, Una-class submarine, but what if the class doesn't have a name, but rather just a designation such as "Type 132" (a class of Yugoslav patrol boats). Do I just go with "Type-132 patrol boat", "Type 132-class patrol boat", or something third?--Saxum (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships)#Ships with hull number only has some info on numbered ship names, but I'm not quite sure what it means - if it were "T132", the title would be written as T132, but I'm not at all sure about "type" here. In that respect, perhaps it would be the best to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. As a side note, are you sure the Type 132 ship has no NATO designated name? For instance Project 641 soviet subs are presented here as Foxtrot-class submarine. I have no clue if the Type 132 had a NATO name or not, but it is not entirely possible. I'm sorry I was not of more help. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your constant and long-standing efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the late unpleasantness in the former Yugoslavia --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I only wish I had more time these days to contribute more! Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 20:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Have you done this map: Croatia Counties 10th century? I think that Lika, Krbava and Gacka should also be added to it. They were under the rule of a ban, but also a part of Croatia. Ferdo Šišić placed them like this: "gatska sa središtem oko današnjega Otočca; lička sa središtem oko današnjega Počitelja; krbavska sa središtem u gradu Krbavi {danas Udbina)", and this is a map from Ivo Goldstein and how he positioned them [[2]] (Rani hrvatski srednji vijek, p. 154). He also switched the positions of counties "Nina" and "Nona", although Šišić and some others place both like you did.Tzowu (talk) 18:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip and the source. I'll add those as soon as I manage some time to tweak the map and the accompanying text. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tanks in the Australian Army may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• During 1973, B Squadron, 1st Armoured Regiment (designated the [[Australian Medium Tank Trials Unit|Medium Tank Trials Unit]] (MTTU) evaluated the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Vance plan at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:56, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Battle of Logorište at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Another fine article. Good luck with A-class and all the best, Miniapolis 17:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

I replied to your message on my talk page. Hal Jespersen (talk) 21:02, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Z-4 Plan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 00:41, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I have plans for writing an article about MiG-21s in service with the Croatian Air Force so I was wondering what would be the appropriate name: MiG-21 in service with the Croatian Air Force and Air Defense or simply MiG-21 in Croatian service? I also hope such and article would meet Wikipedia's notability guidlines because I believe there is plenty of info to be written and the existing articles (Croatian Air Force and MiG-21 operators) would be derailed if I packed them with detailed info regarding the recent crashes and overhauls in Ukraine.--Saxum (talk) 19:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

As long as it meets WP:GNG, I see no problem with any topic at all. I presume a correct title would be "MiG-21 in the Croatian Air Force and Air Defence", though there are other options too. I am aware that there is/was no other combat aircraft (at least no jets) in CAF service, but later on (presumably) topic scopes such as Tanks in the Australian Army - focusing on a weapon type rather than exact model might be worth exploring. At any rate, I like your idea. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

The article Z-4 Plan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Z-4 Plan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 22:22, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Orašje you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 13:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

The article Battle of Orašje you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Orašje for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 03:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

The article Battle of Orašje you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Orašje for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi again. I have a question regarding some photos I would like to use in my article about Croatian MiGs. Commons has a lot of photos of the Croatian aircraft, but unfortunatelly, these are all older photos with none of them being from Ukraine. The only relatively non-private source of these photos is the site of the Croatian MoD. You can see the licence at the bottom of the page. I'm not an expert on the topic so I'm not sure if I could upload the photos (one or two) on Wiki and if so, what licence to use on them?--Saxum (talk) 11:43, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure really. At any rate, the images should be uploaded at the Wikimedia Commons provided they are free. The permission provided at the MoD site indeed seems to provide sufficient background for use under CC-BY-2.0 licence (Template:Cc-by-2.0) or maybe CC-BY-3.0 (Template:Cc-by-3.0-hr). I suggest you to check at the Commons or at WP:MILHIST talk page though.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1st Croatian Guards Corps you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

The article 1st Croatian Guards Corps you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1st Croatian Guards Corps for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 13:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Mistral 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:41, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

The article Operation Mistral 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Mistral 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

G'day Tom, I hope you will re-nominate as a coordinator. You have made significant contributions, and I am sure you will in the future. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 07:24, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Velepromet camp you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

The article Velepromet camp you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Velepromet camp for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 03:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Sana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:41, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Una you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Southern Move you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

The article Operation Sana you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Sana for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:42, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Croatian National Guard at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with the A-class review and all the best, Miniapolis 02:29, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

The article Operation Una you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Operation Una for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

The article Velepromet camp you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Velepromet camp for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

The article Operation Una you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Una for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Z-4 Plan at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with A-class and all the best, Miniapolis 20:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

The article Operation Southern Move you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Southern Move for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's October Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by hundreds of articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts October 1, but you can still sign up!

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Croatia–Serbia border dispute you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WritingEnthusiast14 -- WritingEnthusiast14 (talk) 22:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

The article Croatia–Serbia border dispute you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Croatia–Serbia border dispute for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WritingEnthusiast14 -- WritingEnthusiast14 (talk) 18:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

		The Feather Barnstar
		For your continuous, high-quality effort in creating Good articles, I hereby award you the Feather Barnstar. GregorB (talk) 21:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I hope I'll manage to set aside some editing time (unlike the past month) - and this barnstar will certainly motivate me some more.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Have you ever heard of A64? –Fredddie™ 22:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

No such thing. The highest A-number ever planned was A13.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Kijevo (1991) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:02, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03. You recently reverted a near total balnking of Operation Flash. Did you happen to notice the nature of the content that was blanked? I.e., could this be a POV blanking that might warrant monitoring other edits by this IP? Thanks, regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

I didn't get that impression. If the blanking was intentional (I did not explore the IP's editing elsewhere) it better resembles random vandalism.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

The article Siege of Kijevo (1991) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Kijevo (1991) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Varaždin Barracks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Bjelovar Barracks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Kusonje you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

The article Battle of Kusonje you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Kusonje for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:42, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

The article Battle of Kusonje you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Kusonje for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 16:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

The article Siege of Varaždin Barracks you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Siege of Varaždin Barracks for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

The article Siege of Varaždin Barracks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Varaždin Barracks for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:22, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

The article Siege of Bjelovar Barracks you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Siege of Bjelovar Barracks for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

The article Siege of Bjelovar Barracks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Bjelovar Barracks for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For your extensive contributions to the Military history WikiProject, as evidenced by your nomination in the 2014 "Military Historian of the Year" awards, I am delighted to present you with this WikiProject Barnstar! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:32, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Stinger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Operation Stinger you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Operation Stinger for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Operation Stinger you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Stinger for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Operation Backstop at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with A-class and all the best, Miniapolis 00:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi I see your revert on Operation Jackal of 77.239.11.204 and same person is doing vandalism to article Blaž Kraljević, Croatian Defence Force, and Mostar, please advise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.208.158.248 (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Any claim which is not sourced to a reliable source may be challenged using {{fact}} template inline and removed if no appropriate source is provided. Reverts of one's edits should only be used conservatively - see WP:ROWN (especially "Acceptable reversions" paragraph). In cases of content disputes, see WP:BRD.

I'd also like to take up the opportunity to urge you to register - if registered, the WP:BRD process will be greatly facilitated by use of your talkpage. Cheers!--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

		Military history reviewers' award
		For completing 1 review during October–December 2014, on behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the Military history reviewers' award. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Thanks!--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your outstanding contributions to the 2014 Featured List Croatian special police order of battle in 1991–95, you are hereby awarded this Tireless Contributor barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history Wikiproject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 08:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much!--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baćin massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 04:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

The article Baćin massacre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Baćin massacre for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vukovar massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Operation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

I still think your intervention here would be necessary. Do it as you think it's the best... you can formulate the question also. I don't know if I did it right.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Armenia%E2%80%93Croatia_relations

--Yerevani Axjik (talk) 02:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Tomandjerry211 (talk) 22:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Chocolate-Easter-Bunny.jpg

Well, I just had my first smile of the day checking what "a bit of editing" actually looks like. :-) I'll have some comments, hopefully by the end of the day. GregorB (talk) 07:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Biased and OR text is to be removed wherever it/they may occur in an article -- in the beginning, in the middle, in the end. Quis separabit? 15:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Croatian parliamentary election, 1990 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Croatian parliamentary election, 1990 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cordless Larry (talk) 07:55, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

I replied to both article talk page discussion and noticeboard, yet you hastily and unnecessarily went to the Administrators' noticeboard. Hope to see your explanation what you do not understand about the case and what can be done about it.--Crovata (talk) 21:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vukovar massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:20, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

On 22 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Croatian parliamentary election, 1990, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Croatian parliamentary election of 1990 was the first free, multiparty election for the nation's parliament since 1913? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Croatian parliamentary election, 1990. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Pozdrav, Tomobe03. Uočio sam da si napisao značajan broj članaka vezanih za ratove u bivšoj Jugoslaviji, koji su impresivni jer nisu nacionalistički "obojeni", te imaju veliku dozu kvalitetnih izvora, zbog čega su i postigli status "dobrih članaka". Moj je prijedlog da se prijaviš na Srpskohrvatsku Wikipediju i tamo prevedeš te članke na naš jezik, pošto je to - barem zasad - jedina Wikipedija na našim prostorima gdje je nepristran prijevod ovakvih spornih članaka moguć. Ja sam preveo neke tvoje članke, ali vjerujem da bi ti to najbolje znao pošto si ih i napisao. I sretan ti 1. maj!--Seiya (talk) 12:55, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

The article Vukovar massacre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vukovar massacre for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 22:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

The article Vukovar massacre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vukovar massacre for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Škabrnja massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Croatian parliamentary election, 1990 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the June drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 05:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The article Škabrnja massacre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Škabrnja massacre for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:20, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Baranja you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

• Ping--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I have found a typo in a map that you have uploaded: File:Croatia Serbia border Backa Baranja.svg

There's a label for a place called "Srebrnica" that has been spelled "Srebrenica". Here's a link with a scanned map that includes the area in detail: https://misportal.hcr.hr/HCRweb/faces/simple/Map.jspx

-- Anonimski (talk) 20:08, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The article Operation Baranja you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Operation Baranja for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

		The Military history A-Class medal
		On behalf of the coordinators of the Military History Wikiproject, I am pleased to award you the A-Class Medal to recognise your great work developing the Operation Jackal and United Nations Confidence Restoration Operation in Croatia articles, and the Croatian special police order of battle in 1991–95 list to A-Class status. Cheers,Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 04:15, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed: TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The article Škabrnja massacre you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Škabrnja massacre for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 15:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview: Featured picture participants Op-ed: TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Croatian parliamentary election, 1990 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Winner 42 -- Winner 42 (talk) 17:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

The article Croatian parliamentary election, 1990 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Croatian parliamentary election, 1990 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Winner 42 -- Winner 42 (talk) 02:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The article Croatian parliamentary election, 1990 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Croatian parliamentary election, 1990 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Winner 42 -- Winner 42 (talk) 16:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed: We can (not) advance Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay: Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944 Op-ed: TomStar81 on empires of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum" Op-ed: TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916 Timeline: This month in World War I

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two) Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland Timeline: Events of World War I

Hi, Tomobe03. I'm just posting to let you know that Croatian Special Police order of battle in 1991–95 – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 11. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 20:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites Op-ed: TomStar81 on the rise of air power Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare Op-ed: Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military Interview: A chat with our new project coordinators Review essay: Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War Review essay: Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

In addition, the WikiProject is seeking a new facilitator/coordinator to handle the logistics of the award. Please contact L235 if you are interested in helping with the logistics of running the award in any capacity. Remove your name from here to unsubscribe from further EotW-related messages. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine Op-ed: Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable Op-ed: TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines and recent Australian Army leadership; Nick-D on South African armour Op-ed: Nick-D talks photography Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at two recent releases Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on ANZACs in the Third Ypres Offensive Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at Australian involvement on the Western Front in 1918 and in post-war New Guinea Op-ed: TomStar81 on the October Revolution Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on late 1917 naval warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Halifax Explosion of 1917 Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at tropical medicine and Operation Market Garden Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on US Army doctrine in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Napoleonic Wars and Hawkeye7 on World War II Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on generalship in 1918 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at a work by Daniel Ellsberg Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1918 flu pandemic Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the bombing of Darwin; recent books by female military historians Review essay: K.e.coffman on Wikipedia's representations of the Nazi German military Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Red Baron Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at coalitions and logistics in World War II, and Nick-D at Australia's frontier wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on a supergun of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: This month's external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the murder of the Romanovs Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at a classic US official history Op-ed: TomStar81 on belated declarations of war in 1916–18 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Indy Beetle and Nick-D on the Katangese Gendarmes and India during World War II Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at two important treaties of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies Interview: On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!) Op-ed: TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the close of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 looks at the Sydney Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Indy beetle looks at military newspapers in East Africa

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at Albert Speer Op-ed: Factotem on common problems affecting infoboxes Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Japanese battleship Mikasa

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Navy aviation safety and Australian war crimes trials

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67, Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at three books focussing on the World Wars Op-ed: Indy Beetle on the fall of Idi Amin

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia's leadership and medical services in World War II and Peacemaker67 on Israel's targeted assassinations Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the fate of the German fleet at Scapa Flow

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Dambusters, and Hawkeye7 at Allied code breakers and Australia in New Guinea and Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 on the treaty that ended World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Haweye7, Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on recent books covering the world wars

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the legacy of World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on writing a military biography

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Willbb234 on Allied pilots, Hawkeye7 on the defence of Australia and logistics in Indochina, Nick-D on Australian commandos Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports back on a high-profile history symposium

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on aspects of the Second World War and Cold War

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Jim Mattis

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at a failed German counterattack in the Battle of Normandy

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the logistics behind the Crusades and the USAF's early Cold War nuclear deterrant

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at fortifications, the German Army, and post-Cold War conflict

Thank you for uploading File:Bombardment of Dubrovnik Croatia by Yugoslav Peoples Army on 6 December 1991.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:43, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the naval siege of Japan in 1945

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hadrian's Wall and Hawkeye7 on the British military Op-ed: Nick-D on diversity and military history

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Nick-D on 1945

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review Essay: Nick-D on the Historical Aircraft Restoration Society

Do you mind increasing the relevance of the Mihovil Španja article as we still do not have more prominent person of this profile in the sport in Croatia. Thank you! Zblace (talk) 09:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Franklin Roosevelt in World War II and Hog Farm on the Battle of Chancellorsville

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D & Hawkeye7 look at two aspects of 20th Century warfare Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Unknown Soldiers

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tito–Stalin split, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Liberation Movement. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the war in Ukraine

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tito–Stalin split you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Extraordinary Writ -- Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

The article Tito–Stalin split you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tito–Stalin split for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Extraordinary Writ -- Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)