User talk:Wikijsmak

I'm just now reading your contributions to Red Oak, Iowa. They are good, except one thing: what does "Id." mean? Thanks for your contributions! Nyttend 13:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I take it that you mean something similar to ibid? Such a style is not useful on Wikipedia, not because it's a bad style, but because other references can easily and properly be inserted between those two, thus confusing the reader who doesn't dig deeply into the article history to find when the references were first added. I'm going to change them, and you can easily see the proper way (or rather, one proper way) to do it. Thanks for getting back to me! Nyttend 03:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated Florence Jaffray Harriman, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on March 2, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks. Discussion has already begun, and there are suggestion on how to improve the referencing. You may want to check that out. Happy editing. PFHLai (talk) 06:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jsmak. Yep, you've made the improvements I suggested. The only further thing I'd recommend is to add an Infobox Person to the article. Great article, by the way. Manxruler (talk) 14:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I'd just like to congratulate you on the DYK and tell you that I think the article look really great. Keep up the good work! Manxruler (talk) 23:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never would have known about Daisy if not for your DYK piece. The whole article has improved nicely in the last week. I'm happy to have helped. Dang Fool (talk) 16:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Florence Jaffray Harriman, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Victuallers (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! Has been added to Portal:Norway. Cirt (talk) 00:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You asked an excellent question on the discussion page of this article. There is for sure a mistake on this page which is the source for the date of Réveilhac's death. The birthdate is correct, I received the birth certificate of the General from the mairie of Aurillac, but I never received his death certificate. So considering the article in The Times, the deathdate should be before 1935. Best regards. SalomonCeb (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) However, I cannot upgrade it anymore by myself. The next class requires it to be a good article. For that, it needs to meet the good article criteria. Once you think it meets the criteria, nominate it and a good article reviewer will take a look at it and either upgrade it, turn it down, or put it on hold. Good luck! Green caterpillar (talk) 20:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leonard Lomell, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Nice work. Do you have any other available sources from which the article could be expanded? Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your outstanding work on the page. If I hadn't checked the history page, I would have had no idea that it's only a week old. Well done! I don't believe that I have any direct contact to any WWII-era Rangers, however I will certainly ask around in the Ranger community to see if I can come up with a photo of 1SG Lomell. Thanks again. EvilCouch (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was so impressed with the awesome job that you did on the Constance Drexel article that I nominated it for DYK. I can see that I'm not the only person that is impressed with your work. Great job and keep it up! Royalbroil 02:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I knew that DYK was backed up a few days, so I expected it to be a few days late. Royalbroil 03:00, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Constance Drexel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you for your contributions! - Mailer Diablo 19:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! I see you did some work on Albert Blithe. I had done some research into Mr. Blithe, but the farther I dug, the more I got a bad taste in my mouth.

I had contacted Tom Hanks and Play-Tone about doing a 20-minute documentary to correct the problem.

Here is an email communication with his son Gordon:

EMAIL:

Do you have more information about your father? Did his brother, Joseph, also serve?

REPLY:

my dad was born in philly Pa..i dont know where his parents where born...his brother joe did not serve,,he was a horse trainer...my sister was from my dads first marraige..my fathers parents where joesph and Betty Blithe...my uncle joe was my dds half brother...and yes im alberts blithes only son...my sister lives in delaware,,but out of respect for i cant give you her email addy..besides she was adopted by her step dad when she was 3

ANOTHER EMAIL:

Something is not right here.

This website:

http://www.normandy1944.info/index.html

Says:

"Albert received the Purple Heart for his wounds on June 25th, 1944. Released from Army Hospitals on: October 8, 1945."

But, then you show an image: "Albert's personal jump record." (which is also here: :http://www.506infantry.org/his2ndbnwwiiphoto24.html)

The problem is:

How can he have been in the hospital and also have jumped in Holland in September of 1944? Was he injured twice? Once before Holland, went to the hospital and then was injured again? If was injured on 25 June 1944 and stayed in the hospital until 8 OCT 1945 the jump record is wrong.

Please clarify...

REPLY:

yes i know this is a mystery,,,and im going to leave it at that...finding out about my dad being protryaed in BoB and other things i jave found out has blown me away so im going to leave it at that..

RESPONSE:

Thanks for getting back to me.

"to leave it at that.." is what Ambrose did, as did the screenwriters and researchers for Play-Tone. If only Ambrose would have dotted the "i's" and crossed the "t's" in the first place...

Distortion and crappy research in, distortion and crappy content out. I feel uncomfortable when people do crappy research. If they are going to do that, then they should make it a work of fiction and give "characters" fictional names. How much money did Ambrose make from his books? Millions and millions.

Well, it was nice that your dad kept serving now matter in what capacity, I just wish more people knew that. And also people should know not to take things that people like Ambrose say as gospel. His work is chalked full of errors.

Carry on...

So, we will never know the full story here.

Also, I would like to remove Gordon's name from the article to respect his privacy and because his daughter's name is not there also, to make it fair and balanced.

Keep up the good work.

- 4.240.159.188 (talk) 00:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On August 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cuban fever, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 23:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Your contributions are very impressive and they are (very much) appreciated by those of us who are interested in what is known to be correct... as far as this "shipbuilding" community is concerned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.118.180 (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for helping out with the San Antonio Sporting District article. Can I ask a favor? I have not been able to find copies of the text from the San Antonio Light articles you are referencing and I cannot find any other sources to corroborate your edits. Can you insert quotations from the article into the citations (using the quote= field) just to clarify for any reviewers what precisely the news articles said?

Thanks.

--Mcorazao (talk) 14:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting this article. She's a distant relative whom I discovered in my family roots research. -- Brangifer (talk) 07:49, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: 10 FEB 2008, 22:22 HOURS submission, to Red Oak IA article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Oak,_Iowa. Regarding Reference 4, please see http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1876269/redoak.jpg which contains page 2, 03 JAN 1946, Mason City (IA) Globe-Gazette. I am unable to locate (on page 2 of the newspaper) mention of "Emmet County Leads in War Dead Ratio". Assistance would be appreciated in locating that article or similar article(s) about the ranking of Montgomery County (IA) casualties per capita. Iowa2020 (talk) 05:04, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I may have mixed up the newspapers, because I found the article again on page 2 of the Jan. 3 Council Bluffs Nonpareil, with the "Emmet County Leads in War Dead Ratio" headline. It's on the fifth column from the left, as the first full story. I'll substitute that newspaper name for the MCG-G, at least in the short term.Wikijsmak (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Mason City Globe-Gazette version of the story appeared the previous day (January 2, 1946), on page 11. It was entitled "Cerro Gordo Casualty Figure 3.7 per 1,000."Sorry for the confusion. Wikijsmak (talk) 04:13, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! At Wikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judges, we have bot-created thousands of articles on United States federal judges. Of those 1,272 currently still have their bot-made cleanup tag. If just a dozen editors will each commit to cleaning up just two of those articles every week, we will conquer the entire list within the year. Most of the articles are quick and easy to clean up, requiring only a few minor adjustments of bot-created awkward wording. Please consider joining this effort, and committing to cleaning up two judges per week for the year. Cheers! bd2412 T 03:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mina Van Winkle, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://content.cdlib.org/view?docId=kt6x0nb1ts&brand=calisphere&doc.view=entire_text.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indented line

Response: The Bot must be broken, because there's not even a sentence fragment in the original text that's also on this page, and it's bewildering that a bot would read it otherwise. The page was created with complete independence from that text. Hope it's fixed soon.Wikijsmak (talk) 04:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GOOD NEWS The division of Wikipedia:WikiProject Iowa
called Wikipedia:WikiProject Iowa/Communities
has been activated.

Hi, you are receiving this notice because you are a member of WikiProject Iowa. I see you have a interest in Red Oak, one of Iowa's many cities. I hope you will take the time to check out the developing division called Communities (pre-named and previously red-linked). Keep up the good work.
Please click on the links in the GOOD NEWS notice. RifeIdeas Talk 22:46, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikijsmak! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 02:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated 1900 Hoboken Docks Fire, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Mjroots (talk) 06:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just spotted, the hook fact is unreferenced. You will need to supply a ref for the size of portholes being increased as a result of the fire. Mjroots (talk) 06:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll try to fill that hole today if time permits.Wikijsmak (talk) 12:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mission accomplished.Wikijsmak (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1900 Hoboken Docks Fire, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that as a result of the 1900 Hoboken Docks Fire in New Jersey, the size of portholes on ships was increased so that they could be used as a means of escape in an emergency? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 October 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Louis DeSalvio, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that New York State Assemblyman Louis DeSalvio co-authored a bill that allowed Castle Clinton to become a national monument, thus thwarting Robert Moses' plan to demolish it? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Katharine Balfour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, since Katharine Balfour, be advised that you can add one image of her to the article despite copyright, under WP:Fair use. You can use the WP:Upload wizard, just make sure you can give the exact website you got the image from, and that the image is no larger than the small display thumb size on the screen (i.e. not a huge clickable high-res image, we're legally required to use the minimum). Nice work on your article, though I would note that on GoogleBooks there are a number of published works discussing her you could cite as well. Note you can instantly turn GoogleBooks URLs into Wikipedia footnotes using http://reftag.appspot.com . MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Donald Taylor and I'm the Wikipedian-in-Residence with the University of Maryland Libraries, Historic Maryland Newspapers Project. The Historic Maryland Newspapers Project is a part of the National Digital Newspaper Program, a joint program of the Library of Congress and the National Endowment for the Humanities. We are digitizing historic state newspapers for inclusion in the Library of Congress's Chronicling America online digital collection of America’s historical newspapers.

We are conducting a survey of Wikipedia contributors who have cited Chronicling America as a reference in their edits to Wikipedia. It is the objective of our study to identify ways that Chronicling America might be made a better resource for people editing Wikipedia. We recently used Linkypedia to identify contributors who have used Chronicling America. As an editor who has made use of Chronicling America, we hope that you will take our survey.

If you are interested in taking our survey, you can do so at this website.

More information about the survey is provided before you begin answering survey questions. Participation in the survey is strictly voluntary. It should take you less than thirty minutes to complete. You must be at least 18 years old to participate. If you have any questions about this survey, you can contact Donald Taylor, Wikipedian-in-Residence for the Historic Maryland Newspapers Project, at dwtii@umd.edu, or Elizabeth Caringola, Historic Maryland Newspapers Project Librarian, at ecaringo@umd.edu.

If you decide to take this survey, please do so within a week, by Wednesday, 6 August 2014.

Thank you for your contribution to our study.

-- Taylordw (talk) 15:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikijsmak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

We would need evidence to show he had significant roles in some of the listed works as this is what we would accept, and notability cannot be inherited from others alone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Reynolds (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 02:46, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikijsmak. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jack Reynolds (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikijsmak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jack Reynolds".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikijsmak. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I hope this message finds you well! My name is Scott, and I work with a project called SCALES, out of Northwestern University (https://scales-okn.org). We recently received a grant from the National Science Foundation to create a national resource for enabling access to court records and increasing the transparency of the justice system. Here's a paper we published recently in Science discussing the goals of our project, as well as an introductory video.

As you've contributed to the US courts and judges WikiProject, I wanted to reach out and inquire into how this SCALES corpus might be useful to you as an editor. We have a great deal of data and metadata about judges & lawyers in the federal court system that could improve lots of stubs and B-/C-class articles (something I'm personally excited about, since in my brief teenage Wikipedia-editing heyday I was often drawn to working with stubs and new articles). And in general, I think the SCALES platform will be a powerful tool for empowering citizens to understand the judiciary and its impact on the country, a priority I know many of us share in this topic space.

Let me know if you're interested in talking further and helping us understand how we can work with you. Thanks for your time!

All best,

Scott —Preceding undated comment added 18:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]