In quantum mechanics, the Wigner's 3-j symbols, also called 3-jm symbols, are an alternative to Clebsch–Gordan coefficients for the purpose of adding angular momenta.[1] While the two approaches address exactly the same physical problem, the 3-j symbols do so more symmetrically.
Mathematical relation to Clebsch–Gordan coefficients
The 3-j symbols are given in terms of the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients by
The j and m components are angular-momentum quantum numbers, i.e., every j (and every corresponding m) is either a nonnegative integer or half-odd-integer. The exponent of the sign factor is always an integer, so it remains the same when transposed to the left, and the inverse relation follows upon making the substitution m3 → −m3:
The summation is performed over those integer values k for which the argument of each factorial in the denominator is non-negative, i.e. summation limits K and N are taken equal: the lower one the upper one Factorials of negative numbers are conventionally taken equal to zero, so that the values of the 3j symbol at, for example, or are automatically set to zero.
Definitional relation to Clebsch–Gordan coefficients
The CG coefficients are defined so as to express the addition of two angular momenta in terms of a third:
The 3-j symbols, on the other hand, are the coefficients with which three angular momenta must be added so that the resultant is zero:
Here is the zero-angular-momentum state (). It is apparent that the 3-j symbol treats all three angular momenta involved in the addition problem on an equal footing and is therefore more symmetrical than the CG coefficient.
Since the state is unchanged by rotation, one also says that the contraction of the product of three rotational states with a 3-j symbol is invariant under rotations.
Selection rules
The Wigner 3-j symbol is zero unless all these conditions are satisfied:
Symmetry properties
A 3-j symbol is invariant under an even permutation of its columns:
An odd permutation of the columns gives a phase factor:
Changing the sign of the quantum numbers (time reversal) also gives a phase:
The 3-j symbols also have so-called Regge symmetries, which are not due to permutations or time reversal.[2] These symmetries are:
With the Regge symmetries, the 3-j symbol has a total of 72 symmetries. These are best displayed by the definition of a Regge symbol, which is a one-to-one correspondence between it and a 3-j symbol and assumes the properties of a semi-magic square:[3]
whereby the 72 symmetries now correspond to 3! row and 3! column interchanges plus a transposition of the matrix. These facts can be used to devise an effective storage scheme.[3]
Orthogonality relations
A system of two angular momenta with magnitudes j1 and j2 can be described either in terms of the uncoupled basis states (labeled by the quantum numbers m1 and m2), or the coupled basis states (labeled by j3 and m3). The 3-j symbols constitute a unitary transformation between these two bases, and this unitarity implies the orthogonality relations
The triangular delta{j1j2j3} is equal to 1 when the triad (j1, j2, j3) satisfies the triangle conditions, and is zero otherwise. The triangular delta itself is sometimes confusingly called[4] a "3-j symbol" (without the m) in analogy to 6-j and 9-j symbols, all of which are irreducible summations of 3-jm symbols where no m variables remain.
Relation to spherical harmonics; Gaunt coefficients
Wigner 3-j symbols are related to RacahV-coefficients[7] by a simple phase:
Relation to group theory
This section essentially recasts the definitional relation
in the language of group theory.
A group representation of a group is a homomorphism of the group into
a group of linear transformations over some vector space. The linear
transformations can be given by a group of matrices with respect to some basis of the vector space.
The group of transformations leaving angular momenta invariant is the three dimensional rotation group SO(3).
When "spin" angular momenta are included, the group is its double covering group, SU(2).
A reducible representation is one where a change of basis can be applied to bring all the matrices into block diagonal form. A representation
is irreducible (irrep) if no such transformation exists.
For each value of j, the 2j+1 kets form a basis for an irreducible representation (irrep)
of SO(3)/SU(2) over the complex numbers. Given two
irreps, the tensor direct product can be reduced to a
sum of irreps, giving rise to the Clebcsh-Gordon coefficients, or by reduction of the triple product
of three irreps to the trivial irrep 1 giving rise to the 3j symbols.
3j symbols for other groups
The symbol has been most intensely studied in the context of the
coupling of angular momentum. For this, it is strongly related to the
group representation theory of the groups SU(2) and SO(3)
as discussed above. However, many
other groups are of importance in physics and
chemistry,
and there has been much work on the symbol for these other groups.
In this section, some of that work is considered.
Simply reducible groups
The original paper by Wigner[1]
was not restricted to SO(3)/SU(2)
but instead focussed on simply reducible (SR) groups.
These are groups in which
all classes are ambivalent i.e. if is a member of a class then so is
the Kronecker product of two irreps is multiplicity free i.e. does not contain any irrep more than once.
For SR groups, every irrep is equivalent to its complex conjugate,
and under permutations of the columns the absolute value of the
symbol is invariant and the phase of each can be chosen so that
they at most change sign under odd permutations and remain
unchanged under even permutations.
General compact groups will neither be ambivalent nor multiplicity free.
Derome and Sharp[8]
and Derome[9] examined the symbol
for the general case using the relation to the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients of
where is the dimension of the representation space of and is the complex conjugate
representation to .
By examining permutations of columns of the symbol, they showed three cases:
if all of are inequivalent then the symbol may be chosen to be invariant under any permutation of its columns
if exactly two are equivalent, then transpositions of its columns may be chosen so that some symbols will be invariant while others will change sign. An approach using a wreath product of the group with [10] showed that these correspond to the representations or of the symmetric group . Cyclic permutations leave the symbol invariant.
if all three are equivalent, the behaviour is dependent on the representations of the symmetric group. Wreath group representations corresponding to are invariant under transpositions of the columns, corresponding to change sign under transpositions, while a pair corresponding to the two dimensional representation transform according to that.
Further research into symbols for compact groups has been performed based on these principles.
[11]
The symbol for the group SU(4) has been studied
[20][21]
while there is also work on the general SU(n) groups
[22][23]
Crystallographic point groups
There are many papers dealing with the symbols or Clebsch-Gordon coefficients for the finite crystallographic point groups
and the double point groups
The book by Butler
[24]
references these and details the theory along with tables.
Magnetic groups
Magnetic groups include antilinear operators as well as linear operators. They need to be dealt with using
Wigner's theory of corepresentations of unitary and antiunitary groups.
A significant departure from standard representation theory is that the multiplicity of the irreducible corepresentation
in the direct product of the irreducible corepresentations
is generally smaller than the multiplicity of the trivial corepresentation in the triple
product , leading to significant differences between the Clebsch-Gordon
coefficients and the symbol.
The symbols have been examined for the grey groups
[25][26]
and for the magnetic point groups
[27]
^ abcWigner, E. P. (1993). "On the Matrices Which Reduce the Kronecker Products of Representations of S. R. Groups". In Wightman, Arthur S. (ed.). The Collected Works of Eugene Paul Wigner. Vol. A/1. pp. 608–654. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02781-3_42. ISBN978-3-642-08154-5.
^ abRasch, J.; Yu, A. C. H. (2003). "Efficient Storage Scheme for Pre-calculated Wigner 3j, 6j and Gaunt Coefficients". SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25 (4): 1416–1428. doi:10.1137/s1064827503422932.
^
Butler, P. H.; Wybourne, B. G. (1976). "Calculation of j and jm Symbols forArbitrary Compact Groups. I. Methodology". Int. J. Quantum Chem. X (4): 581–598. doi:10.1002/qua.560100404.
^
Haacke, E. M.; Moffat, J. W.; Savaria, P. (1976). "A calculation of SU(4) Glebsch-Gordan coefficients". J. Math. Phys. 17 (11): 2041. Bibcode:1976JMP....17.2041H. doi:10.1063/1.522843.
^
Baird, G. E.; Biedenharn, L. C. (1964). "On the representations of the semisimple Lie Groups. III. The explicit conjugation Operation for SUn". J. Math. Phys. 5 (12): 1723. Bibcode:1964JMP.....5.1723B. doi:10.1063/1.1704095.
^
Butler, P. H. (1981). Point Group Symmetry Applications: methods and tables. Plenum Press, New York.
^
Kotsev, J. N.; Aroyo, M. I.; Angelova, M. N. (1984). "Tables of Spectroscopic Coefficients for Magnetic Point Group Symmetry". J. Mol. Structure. 115: 123–128. doi:10.1016/0022-2860(84)80030-7.
L. C. Biedenharn and J. D. Louck, Angular Momentum in Quantum Physics, volume 8 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1981.
D. M. Brink and G. R. Satchler, Angular Momentum, 3rd edition, Clarendon, Oxford, 1993.
A. R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1960.
Lezuo, K. J. (1972). "The symmetric group and the Gel'fand basis of U(3). Generalizations of the Dirac identity". J. Math. Phys. 13 (9): 1389. Bibcode:1972JMP....13.1389L. doi:10.1063/1.1666151.
Paldus, Josef (1974). "Group theoretical approach to the configuration interaction and perturbation theory calculations for atomic and molecular systems". J. Chem. Phys. 61 (12): 5321. Bibcode:1974JChPh..61.5321P. doi:10.1063/1.1681883.
Schulten, Klaus; Gordon, Roy G. (1975). "Exact recursive evaluation of 3j and 6j-coefficients for quantum mechanical coupling of angular momenta". J. Math. Phys. 16 (10): 1961–1970. Bibcode:1975JMP....16.1961S. doi:10.1063/1.522426.
Paldus, Josef (1976). "Unitary-group approach to the many-electron correlation problem: Relation of Gelfand and Weyl tableau formulations". Phys. Rev. A. 14 (5): 1620. Bibcode:1976PhRvA..14.1620P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.14.1620.
Raynal, Jacques (1978). "On the definition and properties of generalized 3-j symbols". J. Math. Phys. 19 (2): 467. doi:10.1063/1.523668.
Sarma, C. R. (1982). "Determination of basis for the irreducible representations of the unitary group for U(p+q)↓U(p)×U(q)". J. Math. Phys. 23 (7): 1235. Bibcode:1982JMP....23.1235S. doi:10.1063/1.525507.
Nikam, R. S.; Dinesha, K. V.; Sarma, C. R. (1983). "Reduction of inner-product representations of unitary groups". J. Math. Phys. 24 (2): 233. Bibcode:1983JMP....24..233N. doi:10.1063/1.525698.
Chen, Jin-Quan; Collinson, David F.; Gao, Mei-Juan (1983). "Transformation coefficients of permutation groups". J. Math. Phys. 24 (12): 2695. Bibcode:1983JMP....24.2695C. doi:10.1063/1.525668.
Rasch, J.; Yu, A. C. H. (2003). "Efficient Storage Scheme for Pre-calculated Wigner 3j, 6j and Gaunt Coefficients". SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25 (4): 1416–1428. doi:10.1137/s1064827503422932.