User talk:Mabdul

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Mabdul}} on your talk. Please click here to leave me a new message. If you want to ask me here why your AfC submission was declined, please go to our Help Desk or the Teahouse instead!

Archives

October 2008 - February 2010 March 2010 - July 2010 July 2010 - March 2011 End March 2011 - End July 2011 August 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - April 2012 (failed RfA) April 2012 - July 2012 July 2012 - October 2012 October 2012 - /barnstars

Please advise in detail I do to understand the flaw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.135.86.0 (talk) 08:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sry? I don't understand. Can you explain the situtaion a bit more? mabdul 14:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Can you tell me, why you removed my addition of parm on the comparision of project management software page?

Br Thomas ThomasRJaeger

Hi ThomasRJaeger,

did you read the "edit notice" above the edit text field? Every software that does not have it's own article at Wikipedia get instantly removed from that list. Please read also WP:WTAF. mabdul 14:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

we no longer have that title — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.218.52 (talk) 21:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sry, I don't understand. Can you explain your request more clearly? Which page are you talking about? mabdul 16:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

check it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Petrb/Weird_pages and confirm I can run it over this list Petrb (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what's this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/2006-12-25 Petrb (talk) 15:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	For your work on the AfC helper script! APerson (talk!) 13:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Inactive account creators. Thank you. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 07:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mabdul. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 03:29, 19 August 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:29, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cllr. Rabia Bhatti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roohi Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Torben Bakager Larsen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mabdul. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Cllr. Rabia Bhatti.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cllr. Rabia Bhatti}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. mabdul 05:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UnitedBankofIndiaLogo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#A proposed tool for reducing backlogs. APerson (talk!) 17:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Come see us on IRC and

Hello, Mabdul. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

@Technical 13: WP:DEADLINE. There's no hurry. Real life isn't always the most glamorous thing in the world, but we all have to do it (sometimes) ;) Theopolisme (talk) 12:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As said by mail: it seems that I don't have any "special" permission, too. mabdul 14:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that Nathan2055 gave it to you. :/ Theopolisme (talk) 15:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

me too... mabdul 05:17, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't suppose you could email him mabdul? I left a note on his talk page, but he doesn't have email enabled and i don't seem to have his email address. I'd hate to have to create a new project and move everything over so that we can properly manage it. But, it might be an option that we will be forced to consider if we can't get a hold of him. Technical 13 (talk) 12:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what's the issue here? --Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 14:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mabdul: It looks like the submitter of the above article took your advice, but then didn't resubmit for one reason or another. What do you think of the article now? —Anne Delong (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have resubmitted it simply. I haven't the time to review articles. mabdul 10:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Should I not have deleted that? Was I too hasty?

By the way: Hi! Long time!!!! :) :) :) How's things? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I'm not sure if I thanked you for your support at my RfA. If I forgot: Thank you!!!! (I'm increasingly forgetful, and can't even remember having put the kettle on half the time.) :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anna,

looking at WP:NSONG, I believe it shouldn't have been deleted:

The following factors suggest that a song or single may be notable, though a standalone article should still satisfy the aforementioned criteria.

1. Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts.

Regards, mabdul 10:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just restored it. I hope you can accept my humblest apologies as I was acting in good faith. I thought all of those criteria should be met.

Please see: User talk:Anna Frodesiak#Trouble (Neon Jungle song)

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore the talk page, too. mabdul 10:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry again. I think that was my first incorrect delete, so I didn't know that the talk page didn't undelete automatically. Sorry for all the trouble. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Everybody has to learn how to deal with the tools. Actually I could improve experience at test.wikipedia.org as I'm doing there my AFCH tests. (although I'm not an admin at enwp) mabdul 10:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you deleted and declined or refused to publish the article on Breakdown of Sanity? there is loads of link and sources for the article yet it isn't published? i tried to start my own article about them without noticing there is already one but it has not been published. is there a reason for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremevic (talk • contribs) 03:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Mabdul, thanks for your recent assistance cleaning up my I AM THE BEST ARTIST Rene revision; long-time-no-see! I've just gone public with the related new article René Moncada and I'd like to ask for your help: I will next submit it to DYK, and knowing what I went through for the initial IATBA article I may need some support backing the nomination! At your convenience please do check it out and help keep an eye on it? Thanks friend! Penwatchdog (talk) 14:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Penwatchdog,

OK, I already fixed the references and some other small stuff using some scripts. Maybe I find some time today to READ the article, I'm rather busy this and the next weeks. Most visible stuff is already fixed, so create a nomination page and transclude it on the DYK/nom page. We will have enough time to fix other issues then. mabdul 07:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

added headline mabdul 12:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My sister is being diagnosed with Acute Transversematis, she is always put on to assistance tube to be able to urinate, sometimes sha has difficulty in breathing and subjected to oxygen currently in Loispaeture Private Hospital, South Africa. Please help.

Monica Ngomane — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.78.32.32 (talk) 10:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sry, but I'm not a doctor and I can't help you. You really should ask her doctors.

Moreover Wikipedia is the wrong channel to get help, see Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer. mabdul 12:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mabdul, please see my responses over here, and correct any goofs or mischaracterizations I may have caused. Thanks. User_talk:West.andrew.g#User_permissions

p.s. Actually, I'm assuming you are interested in this discussion about securing the AfC gadget, since you're one of the main gadget-hackers at the moment. If that's an incorrect assumption, my apologies, please just ping me back that you are not interested. Appreciate it. Thanks for improving wikipedia. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 14:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 74.

Actually the the whole script is a "simple" JavaScript and doesn't check for any userrights. (ping @Theopolisme)

"We" (the AFCH developers) actually can't prevent any users for not editing the user by hand (or using an adaption of our own script or more simple at the moemnt: even use our script) and go through the submissions and do whatever he/she wants to do. This has to be done either by a edit filter or by a PHP module which will get loaded. Our proposal a few years ago were turned down by the WMF to implement a userright and that all new articles have to go through AFC. (So deprecating NPP)

I doubt that (whatever you planing to do) it won't succeed as the WMF has some "long term plan" with something called "work flow" (search at meta or mw.org).

Regards, mabdul 23:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• • @User:Bender235 STOP CHANGING LINKS or get a BFRA for not spamming my watchlist. mabdul 20:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Because your personal comfort of reading your watchlist (for a day or two!) is more important than readers' privacy? --bender235 (talk) 20:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Bot policy

Note that high-speed semi-automated processes may effectively be considered bots in some cases, even if performed by an account used by a human editor. If in doubt, check.

It is not all about my fun. Simply stopp it that way. mabdul 06:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mabdul:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mabdul. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 05:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benoit Michel, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Latest stable software release/ZipTorrent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Götz (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mabdul. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Benoit Michel".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benoit Michel}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Torai lies here[1] --- he works for IBM in Ireland. This is why hae has done all the edits to Openoffice.95.172.31.34 (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...I thought that name looked familiar. Well, they can't stop us, 'cause no matter what, WE WILL ASSIMILATE THEM INTO MISSING WIKIPE-

--sorry, yeah, we can fix that. I'll put a notice to his talk page advising against future additions. If the notice that someone doesn't want to be added isn't recent it more than likely won't be seen, so I didn't see it looking through their contributions history.

My bad. Thanks for picking up on it though!

LazyBastardGuy 15:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 02:06, Saturday, February 1, 2025 (UTC)

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 02:06, Saturday, February 1, 2025 (UTC)

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker^talk 05:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 SAMI  ^talk 12:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I notice that you have HighBeam access and you seem to have a few topicons. That being said, if you are interested, I've created {{Wikipedia:HighBeam/Topicon}}. No reply to this message is necessary (and I won't see it unless you ping me), just wanted to let you know it was available. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 23:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Technical 13,

sry, no. I had access I believe, this was long ago. Maybe I would still have, but I can't remember my login.

mabdul 00:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am inviting you to leave me some feedback, 18 months after you opposed my RfA. Do you still believe I am not fit to be an admin? Do you believe I have been able to improve past the concerns you have brought up? Do not be afraid of being too harsh, I am specifically welcoming criticism as I believe it is the best way to improve and I am always looking to learn from my mistakes. I am particularly looking for feedback as to whether you have objections to myself lifting the self-imposed 1RR restriction I had agreed to towards the end of my RfA. If you don't have time to comment, don't fret it either, this is nothing I'll lose sleep over. :) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mabdul, I see that you have been a contributor to WikiProject Citizendium Porting. I am inclined to mark it as defunct, as there has been no work on it in a couple of years and it seems unlikely that Citizendium will be a useful source of content for Wikipedia articles in the future. Is that o.k. with you? RockMagnetist (talk) 18:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RockMagnetist,

Yeah, I'm totally ok with that. I had realized that most articles and drafts are no way better than the Wikipedian ones except some in the technical (computer) area.

mabdul 19:37, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Davina and the Vagabonds instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 22:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mabdul, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 22:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CookieMonster755 (talk) 05:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You are invited to comment at RfC for BARC - a community desysoping process. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Walking Who, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AMN and Unearthed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mabdul,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Avu.ru for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. East Anglian Regional (talk) 16:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:PhilHealth logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 08:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Canada's Food Guide (2007-2018).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Free software programmed in THINK C requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/XChat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/AmIRC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft edge moved to chromium following version 79. I think the timeline should be updated to reflect this. Aaron Liu (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/Miranda NG has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:16, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hina-Di has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable data format. No evidence of significant coverage in independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfire (talk) 06:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Web browser engine nomenclature has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 05:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of browser synchronizers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/HydraIRC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/LimeChat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]