User talk:Tomobe03

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hello, I noticed you are a user who frequents WP:GAN and thought you might be interested in Good Article Review Circles. It is an initiative that helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you will review another user's article and get your own GA nomination reviewed in return. Check out the project page for more details! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tomobe03, You have been paired at good article review circles to review 2007 Greensburg tornado. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #18.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Croatian state right you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Croatian state right you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Croatian state right and Talk:Croatian state right/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Land reform in interwar Yugoslavia at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Dhtwiki (talk) 00:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Tomobe03, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 23:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 23:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Croatian state right you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Croatian state right for comments about the article, and Talk:Croatian state right/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 23:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franco-Prussian War Op-ed: Nick-D visits the Swiss Air Force Museum

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yugoslav Committee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 19:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ivo Frank you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 13:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ivo Frank you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ivo Frank for comments about the article, and Talk:Ivo Frank/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 02:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yugoslav Committee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yugoslav Committee for comments about the article, and Talk:Yugoslav Committee/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes likewise :)

The way this is fixed is to go on either of those pages on Wikipedia, click on the edit button in the language area, and then search for the other one.

So just now I clicked that on the English one, entered "sr" so it brings up the Serbian one, chose that, and then below entered "Jadranska straža", which then autocompleted to the title over there which is in Cyrillic. After that there's a confirmation, and voila.

There can be a complex situation where e.g. two articles' wikidata are identified differently, for example list vs. disambiguation page or similar, which requires further intervention, but connecting normal articles is usually straightforward. --Joy (talk) 13:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I've just gone out of my way to expand the LCY 12th Congress article, and I know you're a prolific creator and editor who has created a ton of very good articles, including the 6th Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia article. I am not completely finished, but I was hoping that if you have any sources or information on the 12th LCY Congress, you would spare some time to take a quick glance.

I am planning to turn all the red links on the Template:League of Communists of Yugoslavia green (at the very minimum, everything on the "Central Organisation" bar) blue, and I have been working on creating and expanding the congress articles. TheUzbek (talk) 12:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words. I don't have much on the 12th Congress specifically, but there are mentions of some of its aspects here [1] and here [2]. The originals are in Croatian, but I expect Google Translate to be capable of producing usable machine translations. Cheers and best of luck in 2025!

Tomobe03 (talk) 15:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of Croatia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Tomobe03 (talk) 13:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Pickersgill-Cunliffe and Nick-D look at Germans in the Flanders Campaign and 50 years of Australian military history Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

Hello, You have been paired at good article review circles to review South Sudan at the 2024 Summer Olympics. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #21.

History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:23, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Land reform in interwar Yugoslavia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of EF5 -- EF5 (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tomobe03! Regarding the change of mine you've reverted on Talk:Tito–Šubašić Agreements, the 'Associated task forces' of {{WikiProject Yugoslavia}} are a result of my recent requests on Template talk:WikiProject Yugoslavia. I have since had the header customized to say 'Associated WikiProjects' instead. The intention behind this feature is reducing banner blindness on Yugoslavia-related talk pages. Talk:Yugoslavia for example is of relevance first and foremost to WikiProject Yugoslavia, but then to all seven of post-Yugoslav country WikiProjects as well. Used sparingly, I consider nesting these WikiProject banners within WikiProject Yugoslavia appropriate only where the topic is non-contemporary and is of utmost relevance to Yugoslavia, and then to one or several contemporary countries that used to be federal units of Yugoslavia (hence nesting being inappropriate on e.g. Talk:Serbo-Croatian). I am wary of implications but believe the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Happy to have your opinion, cheers. –Vipz (talk) 10:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's a particularly bad idea bound to generate disputes and ill will (i.e. all heat and no light) for zero gain because it implies hierarchy where there is none.

WikiProjects Croatia, Serbia etc. are not associated with WikiProject Yugoslavia in any way just as they (or Yugoslavia) are not associated with WikiProject Ottoman Empire. There is no problem if an article is associated with a dozen projects and all those have their respective banner, listed alphabetically or in whatever other order, at the talk page. Tomobe03 (talk) 11:10, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let's move this discussion to the talk page of that template to have it all in one place? –Vipz (talk) 11:24, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Land reform in interwar Yugoslavia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Land reform in interwar Yugoslavia for comments about the article, and Talk:Land reform in interwar Yugoslavia/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of EF5 -- EF5 (talk) 19:44, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Margaret Sanger. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #22.

History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Allied occupation of the eastern Adriatic at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 08:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Baffle gab1978, thank you for your time and effort. The improvements to the article look great.--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it's an interesting article, good luck with your planned GA nom. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 10:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fran Folnegović you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your help with the Margaret Sanger GA nomination. The article is much better thanks to your feedback. I'll be sure to mention your name when I submit it to the FA nomination queue ... but first I'm going to put it through the peer review process. Noleander (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Noleander, I'm glad to have helped. Good luck with further development of the article. Tomobe03 (talk) 23:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]